NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number MW-24218
Edward L. Suntrup, Referee
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company
STATEMENT
OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The dismissal of Cook J. A. Little for alleged violation of
'Rule 18' was capricious, arbitrary, without ~ust and sufficient cause and on
the basis of unproven charges (System File C-4(13)-JAL/12-39(80.22)H).
(2) Cook J. A. Little shall be reinstated with seniority and all other
rights unimpaired, his record be cleared and he shall be compensated for all
wage loss suffered."
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant, Mr. J. A. Little, was employed by the Carrier
approximately 10 years prior to the incident. By letter
dated January 28, 1980 Claimant received notice from the Carrier to attend a
formal investigation on February
6,
1980. He was charged with alleged violation
of that part of Carrier General Rule 18 which reads, in pertinent part, that
" .dishonesty . . immorality
...
making false statements
... will
subject the
offender to dismissal". After postponement, the hearing was held on February 13,
1980. As a result of this hearing Claimant received notice, dated February 22,
1980 that he was dismissed from service.
A review of the transcript of the hearing and other supporting materials
presented to this Board show that Claimant was absent from his assignment on
January 21, 1980. The alleged reason for this absence was Claimant's appearance
in court at the Richmond County Courthouse to resolve an issue related to his
home having been allegedly robbed on January 18, 1980. A written statement to that
effect was presented to the Carrier by the Claimant at about
6:30
PM on January 21,
1980. The basis for Carrier's charge against Claimant is that this statement does
not represent a true version of the facts.
The transcript of the hearing and supporting documents, particularly
the one dated January 22, 1980 from the office of the Sheriff of Richmond County,
Rockingham, North Carolina show sufficient substantial evidence to be present to
warrant the conclusion that Claimant is guilty as charged. And substantial
evidence has been defined as "such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might
accept as adequate to support a conclusion" (Consol. Ed. Co. vs. Labor Board
305
U.S. 197, 229). There is no record of a robbery having been reported prior
to January 21, 1980 which would have necessitated an appearance in court by the
Claimant on that day. Further, no one was found who could testify that Claimant
had recovered stolen goods from the courthouse on that same January 21, 1980.
Indeed, the Sheriff's officer whom Claimant testifies that he notified of the
theft of his personal possessions on January 19, 1980 could not even remember
having had discourse with the Claimant on that day, much less having filled out a
written report which is custom. In the absence of any other supporting evidence,
Award Number
24345
Page 2
Docket Number NEW-24218
therefore, this Board concludes that the Carrier has met the burden of proving the
charge raised against the Claimant. Upon the total record before it, therefore, this
Board finds no justification for disturbing discipline assessed by the Carrier. The
Claimant received a fair hearing whereby substantial evidence established a violation
of Rule 18 in pertinent part and the discipline assessed has not been shown to be
arbitrary, unreasonable nor capricious.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21,
1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest: Acting Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board
By
Rosemarie Brasch -Administrative Assistant
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 27th day of
pp-n
1983. ~;-'%~
Chico
00