IATIORAL RAILROAD ADJUSTWXXT BOARD
TMIRD
DIVISION Docket llu:ber CL-24474
Wi11.1" G.
Lhples, Referee
Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks,
Freight Handlers, Express and Station fnployes
PARTIES TO
DISPUTE:
(The Western Pacific Railroad Company
STAB OF
CLAIM: Claim of the System Cooaittee of the Brotherhood
(G'a9545)
that:
1. The Western Pacific Railroad Cbepnny violated the Rules of
Clerks Agreement Then it arbitrarily and capriciously removed Xs. Pauline
Levis iron service January
13, 1981,
on inadequate charges that vere unproven and failed to return her to service until Februa
23, 1981.
(2)
Tae Western Pacific Railroad shall now be required to
ccapensate Ms. Pauline Lewis for all time lost from and including January
13,
until and including February
23, 1981.
OPIafIOXO CF BARD: On
January
1,3, 1981,
Clalnant, a Guaranteed Extra Board
Clerk, in the Operating Department, of the Carrier's
San Francisco General. Office as a result of an incident occurring that day
vas served a Notice of Formal Investigation on Jaasssry 14, 1981, vhich
stated as its purpose:
'...to MAC=.ain facts and place your respoasibillty,
if a:q, for your alleged Insubordinate behavior to
J. W. Long, General Supervisor-Demnzage at 8:00 A.X.,
Tuesday. January
13, 1981,
and also for your alleged
unauthorised absence an January
13, 1981
....'
As a result of the investigation the Dire ctor-Opemting Adx4inistration found
he could 'only coaclode the charges of insubordination to Mr. Long and your
nnnathorized absence were substantiated by the bulk of the testimony" and
disaisaad Claimant frca service. 'mereafter, a claim vas filed as Claimant's behalf four her restora
February
23, 1981
Claimant vas restored to service `rith seniority rights
unimpaired without prejudice to her right to pursue the claim for lost
rages.
Before ve speak to the substantive issues left to our jurisdiction re mist speak to the procedur
that the charges rare amltipls, so proof of violation (or rules). We have
carefully reviewed the asuplets record and although it is shorn acme discipline other thna discharge
rights.
Award Humber
24408
Page
2
Docket finmber
CL-24474
The question thus left four determination is whether the discipline
is unjust or excessive. In this instance the Board finds that the discipline
vas excessive. The discipline shall be reduced to 10 working days and she
shall be compensated for all time lost in excess of the 10 working days at
her regular rate up to February
23.. 1981*
when she returned to work.
FI1®Il3S: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board.. upon the whole
record and all the evidence,, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute
are respectively Carrier and Employer within the meaning of the Failway
Labor Act,, as approved Jane
21., 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was violated.
A W A R D
Claim sustained in accordance with the Opinion.
NATIONAL RAMROAD AATUSTWT BOARD
By order of Third Division
ATMT: Acting Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board
By ~.~n-~.t~t
Rosenarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant
Dated at Chicago.. Illinoisj, this 15th day of June
1983.