NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTIJENT BOARD
7~
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number SG-24430
Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Southern Pacific Transportation Company (Western Lines)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the General Committee of the Brotherhood of
Railroad Signalmen on the Southern Pacific Transportation
Company (Western Lines):
On behalf of Signal Maintainer R. G. Poulson for all pay and benefits
he was caused to miss while being held out of service December 19 to 31, 1980,
account alleged medical problems." (Carrier file: 011-221(P))
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant's regularly assigned work hours were from 7 A.M. to
3:30 P. M. He was absent from his scheduled duties on
December
16
and 17, 1980. He did, however, accept a call for on-time service or.
December 18th at 1:25 A.M. He did not report for hi;; regular assignment oz
December 18. The following morning, Friday, December 19, Claimant did come to
work. His supervisor, observing that claimant seemed to be in 77ery poor physical
condition and could not stand without support, removed him from service pending an
evaluation of his physical condition.* Claimant was told to report for work on
Monday morning, December 22nd at which time he would be examined by a Carrier
doctor. On that day Claimant picked up a form to be completed by his personal
physician and'reviewed by Carrier's Chief Medical Officer. The completed form
shows that claimant had beer. seen by his own physician on December 20th, that
claimant suffered from ulcers but could return to work with "no restrictions".
The form was signed by claimant's physician on December 22nd. Said form was
reviewed by the Chief Medical Officer on the afternoon of December 30th. After
reviewing the information, the Chief Medical Officer released Claimant to full duty
on December 30 and Claimant reported for work the following day.
The Employes allege that Claimant was disciplined by being withheld from
service in violation of Rule 59, Investigations. The Employes also claim a violation of Rule 74 whic
conducted during regular working hours wi=hout deduction in pay. Finally the
Employes rely upon Rule 72 which states that an employe who loses earnings because
of violation or misapplication of the Agreement shall be made whole. The Employes
demand payment for six days (including 2 holidays) and 13 hours of overtime.
The evidence fails to support any charge of violation of Rule 59.
Claimant was withheld from service only because of his obvious physical weakness.
It is well settled by this Board that a pier may withhold an employe from
service pending medical examination if it has reasonable grounds to question his
physical fitness (Award 14881 - Dorsey).
With regard to a claimed violation of Rule 74, the record is not clear
why a Carrier physician did not examine Claimant on December 22nd. In any event
Award Number
24430
Page 2
Docket Number SG-24430
Claimant was paid for that day. But he was held out of service from December 23rd
to 30th.
This
includes four working days, two holidays and nine hours overtime
worked by the relief maintainer during Claimant's absence.
The question to be decided is whether the Carrier acted with reasonable
diligence in returning Claimant to work. In the absence of any reasonable
explanation why a form submitted on December 22nd was not reviewed until December
30th, the question must be answered in the negative. Accordingly the Board holds
that Carrier shall compensate Claimant for four (4) days at the pro rata rate,
two (2) days at the holiday pro rata rate and nine
(9)
hours time and one-half.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was violated.
A W A R D
Claim sustained in accordance with the Opinion.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest: Acting Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board
3y
r'--c ~'n---it. _ --~-~ t - 'L/
Rosemarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 15th day of June
19830