NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number MW-24542
Edward L. Suntrup, Referee
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The Ann Arbor Railroad System
( (Michigan Interstate Railway Company - Operator)
STATE OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The Carrier violated the Agreement when it assigned and used
J.. Roberson instead of C. R. Gaskill, Jr. to fill a temporary vacancy of
Production Gang Foreman (Gang No. 1, Shift No. 1) March 30, 1981 through
April
5.,
1981.. both dates inclusive.
(2) Because of the aforesaid violation, Dr. C. R. Gaskill, Jr. be
0.11axd pay at the Production Gang Foreman's rate for a number of hours equal
to the total expended by Mr. J. Roberson in performing such work during the
period mentioned in Part (1) hereof."
OPINION OF BOA.°.D: It is the contention of the Claimant, C. R. Gaskill, that<
Carrier was in contravention of current Agreement Rule 3(b)
and Rule 18(c) when it assigned, from March 13, 1981 to April 5, 1981,
J. Roberson rather than himself the position of production foreman of Gang 1,
Shift 1 as advertised by Bu11etin
14,
dated baron
16,
1981.
The record before the Hoard shows that Carrier bulletined a number
of permanent positions on 'Mrxch
16,
1981 and that Claimant, in accordance with
Rule bid on ten (10) of these positions in descending order of preference.
Claimant's first choice was Bulletin No. 28, which .as for Gang 2, Shift 1
and Claimant's third. choice was Bulletin No.
14,
which was for Gang 1, Shift 1
of two gangs which Carrier contemplated establishing on a twelve (12) hour a
day basis for seven
(7)
consecutive days which were to be followed by seven
(7)
rest days. Mr. J. Roberson also bid, but as first choice, Bulletin 14. The
record further shows that by order of
the state
of Michigan, owner of the Car
rier, all Bulletins for the pe-:nent positions in question were cancelled by
the Carrier on April 3, 1981. Since, according to Carrier, Bulletin No. 14 posi
tion was to commence work on March 30, 1981- and Bulletin No. 28 was not to start
work until April
5,
1981, Carrier claim is that :·e days
:r.
Roberson worked the
Bulletin No. 14 position, before the cancellation letter of April 3, 1931, plus
the additional two (2) days "to clean up (what) the gang had started", were ac
ceptable under the Agreement since the Carrier ultimately found itself in a
situation which, because of the "directive of the state" (was) "outside the con
trol of the Carrier". Quite simply, the Board sees the reasonableness of the
position of the Carrier in this respect and denies the claim on its merits.
Award Number
24436
Docket Number NTW-24542
Page 2
Of considerable concern to the Board, however, in the instant case
is the state of the record presented to it. At no point in its ex parte submission does Organization
28
(nor of any of the other Bulletins introduced in fact or by reference) nor
is this information found in the original Bulletins themselves. Only after
considerable conjecture and puzzling over this case, supplemented by the
Board's analysis of the correspondence accompanying the case, does it filly
become clear why relief was requested between the dates of March
30.. 1981
and April 5, 1981 by the Organization in the first place. It is the reponsibility of parties sub
submissions and supporting data which are consistent with each other and
sensibly decipherable. The instant case did not reasonably meet that test
and on those grounds alone provided the Board with justifiable reason to dismiss it, e:Ry considerat
:Ih'DIIv~: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all `,.he evidence, finds and holds:
'Mat the panties waived oral hearing;
That the Crier and the ElEaployes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Eiaployes within the meaning of the R;ilvay Labor
Act, as approved June 21,
1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction
over the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
ATTEST: Acting Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board
By /l.~-'--=~'-`. ~. c,t_ J_ / i~ i
_/~ Rosem_-rie Brasch - Administrative Assistant
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJLST:viENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 15th day of June
1983.