NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
Award Number 24502
_ THIRD DIVISION Docket Number MW-24565
George V. Boyle, Referee
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation
( (former Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Company)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The ninety (90) days of suspension imposed upon Machine Operator
V. R. Brooks, Jr. for alleged violation of Rule 'G' was arbitrary and capricious
and upon the basis of unproven charges (System File RTA-D-956/D-11-18-15).
(2) The claimant's record shall be cleared of the charge leveled
against him and he shall be compensated for all wage loss suffered."
OPINION OF BOARD: Machine Operator, V. R. Brooks, employed by the Northeast
Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation, was assigned
on October 10, 1980 to the Tie Gang working near 97th Street and Vincennes Avenue
at Chicago, Illinois. At lunch time he and other employes bought their lunch
and ate behind a grocery store adjacent to the work site. In the course of
their lunch two of the Carrier's supervisors came to the area and confiscated
an unopened can of beer in a paper bag which they had observed on the ground
under the leg of Machine Operator Brooks.
Subsequently, after a proper hearing, Brooks was suspended for ninety
(90) days for violation of Rule "G" which reads "Possession of intoxicants ...
while on duty is prohibited."
The Employes argue that the Carrier has not met the burden of proof,
which is its repsonsibility, and has based its action upon mere suspicion and
allegation and not probative evidence.
Further, it is argued that the Claimant was not on company property and
was on his lunch period and ther:fore not "on duty" when the incident occurred.
The Board finds to the contrary on both contentions.
The claimant, in his testimony, admits that when the Carrier's agent
took possession of the paper bag containing the unopened can of beer that it was
under his leg and that the agent physically had to move the claimant's leg in order
to take it. This is not circumstantial evidence; this is probative, physical
evidence adduced by the Carrier's agents and corroborated and the Claimant's own
testimony. It is not necessary for the material to be held in the hand or for the
person to have contact with it to be considered under his control or in his
possession. Thus the Carrier has met the burden of proof with respect to
(,"possession of intoxicants", a disciplinary offense.
1R I f
Award Number 24502 Page 2
Docket Number MW-24565
Moreover, while-the Claimant was not actually engaged in work and not
on Company property, he was in a "duty" status and subject to the rules with
respect to such status. Therefore, the Claimant was not immune to the Carrier's
jurisdiction.
Nevertheless, while the Claimant was properly disciplined for this
infraction, ninety days suspension seems unduly harsh, particularly since, up
until this time the Claimant had a good record. Accordingly, the suspeu_on is
reduced to thirty (30) days.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the discipline was excessive.
A W A R D
Claim sustained in accordance with the Opinion.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest
Nancy er - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 30th day op Augusl 1983.
RECEI VE
SEP ',.
C
'c . C~
°oo p?;ice
i
a.