NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Locket Number MW-24871
Eckehard Muessig, Referee
(Brotherhood
of
Maintenance
of
Way Dnployes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) -
( Northeast Corridor
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim
of
the System Committee
of
the Brotherhood that:
(1) The thirty (30) days
of
suspension imposed upon Tracknan L. Minella
for alleged ·Violation
of
Amtrak Rules
of
Conduct 'I' and 'J'" was arbitrary
and on the basis
of unproven charges
(System Locket 253D).
(2) The claimant's record shall be cleared
of
the charges leveled against
him and he shall be compensated for all wage loss suffered.
OPINION OF BOARD: This dispute resulted from an incident which occurred on
Friday, July 17, 1981. On that date, Carrier contends that
the Claimant, a Trackman,
willfully
spat upon a Project Engineer in order to
provoke a fight. Following an .investigative trial, the Claimant was suspended
from the Carrier's service for thirty (30) days.
The Claimant holds that the Carrier did not meet its burden
of
proof in
this case, contending that it relied upon the uncorroborated testimony
of
one
witness. He further contends that he did not receive a fair and impartial hearing,
because the trial officer did not "use sound discretion in seeing that the rights
of
the employee are fully protected ·.
The Board has carefully reviewed the
investigative transcript
to insure
that the Claimant was provided a fair and impartial hearing. We do not find that
the Carrier acted in an arbitrary or capricious manner in the proceedings leading
to the suspension.
With respect to the merits
of
the issues and the conflict
of
testimony
at the hearing, we find no basis to disturb a long body
of
Awards by this Division
which have established that it is not the Board's role to pass on credibility of
witnesses or resolve conflicts in testimony. These functions are reserved to the
Carrier.
In arriving at its penalty, the Carrier considered the incident at hand
and the Claimant's past disciplinary record. On the record before us we find
that the Carrier's actions were not unreasonable.
FINDINGS: The Third Division
of
the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
Award Number 24689 Page 2
Locket Number MW-24871
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as
approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:
Nancy J. DeKy~ecutive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois this 24th day of February, 1984
~r
1rn 5 ,