NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number MW-23846
Josef P. Sirefman, Referee
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Southern Pacific Transportation Company (Pacific Lines)
STATMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The Carrier's disqualification of Ballast Tamper (Multiple)
Operator G. R. Morentin as operator of Ballast Tamper No. 112RC Canron Model
ETGD (assigned to Extra Gang No. 43) on January 23, 1979 was improper, without just,
sufficient or reasonable cause and in violation of the Agreement (System File
MofW 36-212).
(2) Because of the aforesaid violation, G. R. Morentin shall be
permitted to displace the operator of Ballast Tamper No. 112RC assigned to Extra
Gang No. 43; be accorded on-the-job training as is necessary for him to become
proficient in the operation thereof; be allowed the difference in what he received
in a lower rated position and what he should have received as operator of Ballast
Tamper NO. 112RC, beginning January 23, 1979; be allowed all expenses incurred
as presented and itemized on expense sheets and be compensated for all time
expended traveling to and from the position on which he was required to displace.
(3) The discipline (letter of reprimand dated April 23, 1979) was
improper and unwarranted and same shall be expunged from the claimant's personal
record because of the Carrier's failure to hold and conduct an investigation in
compliance with the procedural requirements of Rule 45(a).
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant G. R. Moretin, a Ballast Tamper (Multiple) Operator
with class 6 seniority, returned to work from an authorized
leave on January 22, 1979. During his absence his position was abolished and
Claimant bid into a position requiring him to operate a new model ballast tamper
No. 112RC. After the second day of training Claimant was notified that the
Carrier did not accept him on the new machine under Rule 8 (c) "as you do not
meet the necessary qualifications to operate this machine".
It is well established that management can consider an employee's
basic fitness for a position as well as the seniority factor (Third Division
Award 21243). Therefore, the issue reduces to whether or not Claimant, under
Rule 8, was given sufficient opportunity to acquire proficiency on a new and more
complex piece of equipment than he had heretofore operated. Although the
training period afforded Claimant on the new machine would appear to have been
rather brief, an examination of the record establishes that even though the
new machine had some similar features with those he had already operated, there
was no reason to believe that more extensive training at that time would have
been beneficial. Claimant did not master the first phase of training after
two days, even though the average time needed for that operation appears to 1e
Award Number 24755 Page 2
Locket Number MW-23846
a half a day. More important, there is nothing in the record to refute the
assertion by his supervisors that Claimant, despite his relatively slow progress,
was not receptive to instruction. Under these circumstances there was no need
to prolong the training period for a seemingly reluctant student. There is no
basis in the record for granting the claim for expenses on the job Claimant
worked after his 112RC training was terminated. The part of the claim dealing
with a letter of reprimand has been resolved on the property so this matter is
moot. The agreement was not violated.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Rnployes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A WAR D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
Nancy.,Deyver - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago,V
Illinois this 30th day of March, 1984
f,
i / ~.I';;
2't
1',84
· Tn
O(ilc~