NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-24007
Herbert Fishgold, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks
( Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood (OL-9386)
that:
(1) Carrier violated, and continues to violate, the Clerk-Telegrapher
Agreement when, beginning March 14, 1976, and
continuing, it
causes and permits
employees not covered thereby to perform work around-the-clock seven (7) days
per week in connection with the operation of receiving teletype units and similar
devices used for receiving communications, including tearing off and separating
message reports of cars, at Evitts Creek Yard Office, the Eastbound Hump Yard
Office and the Westbound Hump Yard Car Retarder Office, which are three (3)
locations at Cumberland, Maryland, and
(2) Carrier shall, as a result, compensate each employee named, as
indicated, eight (8) hours' pay at the pro-rata rate for each date listed, and
continuing, as follows:
Evitts.Creek Yard Office
7:00 AM to 3:00 PM - B.M. Hill -March 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
29, 30, 31; April 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13,
14, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 26, 27, 28,
29, 30; May 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 1976 and each
subsequent date Monday through Friday of each
week until the violations cease.
3:00 PM to li::00 PM - S. J. Swisher -March 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27,
30, 31; April 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13,
14, 15, 16, 17, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 27, 28,
29, 30; May 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 1976 and each
subsequent date Tuesday through Saturday of ea
wek until the violations cease.
11:00 PM to 7:00 AM - R. L. Shepherd -March 15, 16, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 26, 27, 28,
29, 30; April 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13,
16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 30;
May 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 1976 and each
subsequent date Friday through Tuesday of
each week until the violations cease.
7:00 AM to 3:00 PM - J. M. Emerick -March 20, 21, 27, 28; April 3, 4, 10, 11,
17, 18, 24, 25; May 1, 2, 8, 9, 1976 and
each subsequent Saturday and Sunday of
each week until the violations cease.
Award Number 24862
Docket Number CL-24007 Page 2
3:00 PM to 13:00 PM - K. G. Rotruck -March 21, 28; April 4, 11, 18, 25; May 2,
9, 1976 and each subsequent Sunday of each
week until the violations cease.
3:00 PM to 11:00 PM - C. S. VanMeter -March 15, 22, 29; April 5, 12, 19, 26;
May 3, 10, 1976 and each subsequent Moray
of each week until the violations cease.
11:00 PM to 7:00 AM - D. W. Hanekamp -March 17, 18, 24, 25, 31; April 1, 7, 8, 14,
15, 21, 22, 28, 29; May 5, 6, 1976 and each
subsequent Wednesday and Thursday of each
week until the violations cease.
East Bound Hump Yard Office
7:00 AM to 3:00 PM - T.L.Householder - March 15, 16, 17, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 27,
28, 29, 30, 31; April 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11,
12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 24, 25, 26, 27,
28; May 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 1976 and
each subsequent date Saturday through
Wednesday of each week until the violations
cease.
3:00 PM to 11:00 PM - R.A. Shrout -March 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25,
28, 29, 30, 31; April 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11,
12, 13, 14, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29; May 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 1976
and each subsequent date Sunday through
Thursday of each week until the violations
cease.
11:00 PM to 7:00 AM - J. K. Hunt -March 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 30, 31; April 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10,
13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 27,
28, 29, 30; May 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 1976 and
each subsequent date Tuesday through Saturday
of each week until the violations cease.
7:00 AM to 3:00 PM - G. H. Mechem -March 18, 19, 25, 26; April 1, 2, 8, 9, 15,
16, 22, 23, 29, 30; Play 6, 7, 1976 and each
subsequent Thursday and Friday of each week
until the violations cease.
3:00 PM to 11:00 PM - R.R. Wagner -March 19, 20, 26, 27; April 2,3, 9, 10, 16
17, 23, 24, 30; May 1, 7, 8, 1976 and each
subsequent Friday and Saturday of each week
until the violations cease.
11:00 PM to 7:00 AM - M.E. Roberts -March 14, 15, 21, 22, 28, 29; April 4, 5, 11,
12, 18, 19, 25, 26; May 2, 3, 9, 10, 1976 and
each subsequent Sunday and Monday of each
week until the violations cease.
Docket Number CL-24007 Page 3
7:00 AM to 3:00 PM - G. C. Fisher -March 15, 16, 17, 21, 22, 23, 24, 27, 28, 29,
30, 31; April 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13,
14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28,
1976 and each subsequent dates Saturday
through Wednesday of each week until the
violations cease.
3:00 PM to 11:00 PM - P. G. Li11er _ March 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 27
28, 31; April 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,
14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 28,
29, 30; May 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 1976 and
each subsequent dates Wednesday through SundaS
of each week until the violations cease.
11:00 PM to 7:00 AM - E. E. Gaus -March 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
29, 30, 31; April 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13,
14, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 26, 27, 28,
29, 30; May 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 1976
and each subsequent Monday through Friday of
each week until the violations cease.
7:00 AM to 3:00 PM - J. W. Hemmis -March 18, 19, 25, 26; April 1, 2, 8, 9, 15,
16, 22, 23, 29, 30; May 6, 7, 1976 and each
subsequent Thursday and Friday of each week
until the violations cease.
3:00 PM to 11:00 PM - K. G. Rotruck -March 15, 16, 22, 23, 29,30; April 5, 6, 12,
13, 19, 20, 26, 27; May 3, 4, 10, 11, 1976 and
each subsequent Monday and Tuesday of each
week until the violations cease.
11:00 PM to 7:00 AM - C. M. Beckman -March 20, 21, 27, 28; April 3, 4, 10, 11, 17,
18, 24, 25; May 1, 2, 8, 9, 1976 and each
subsequent Saturday and Sunday of each week
until the violations cease.
OPINION OF BOARD: This dispute, one of six involving the same issue between the
parties, concerns the Carrier's right to permit Yardmasters
and/or Trainmen to "tear off" a list of freight cars, a "switch list," from a
receiving machine following transmittal by use of telecommunications printers at
Cumberland, Maryland.
By way of background, on Play 5, 1976, Carrier established a Terminal
Service Center at Cumberland, Maryland. Similar data centers have been established
at various other terminals throughout the Carrier's system, and such data centers
are essentially a consolidation of yard and agency functions into a central location
where the same machinery and data are available. In most of the terminals where
Carrier has established these new data centers, yard and agency personnel have been
moved into the new Terminal Service Center, leaving only yardmasters in the
individual yards.
The Carrier placed Kleinschmidt and Data Fax Communications receiving machir
in Evitts Creek Yard Office and the Eastbound Hump Yard Office at Cumberland, Maryland
and assigned operation to Yardmasters. The Carrier installed Data Fax equipment in
the Westbound Hump Yard Retarder Office, and assigned operation to Trainmen.
Award Number 24862
Docket Number CL-24007 Page 4
The organization contends that by so doing, the Carrier is causing and
permitting employees not covered by the Clerks-Telegraphers Agreement to operate
such communication receiving devices, including the work of removing (tearing
off) and separating message reports of cars from such devices.
The dispute involves the parties' Scope Rule and Rule 67, Printing and
Telegraph Machines. Claims that the Yardmaster's tearing off the list and separating
the copies violated Rule 67 began to be received on all Carrier's properties.
Since the dispute could not be resolved on the property, the Organization processed
a December 1975 claim in the
Cincinnati yard
office and presented it to this
Board for adjudication. The Board sustained the claim in Award 22912 (Kasler)
which, however, reduced the claim of eight hours pay "for work that took just a
few seconds to perform" to a three-hour call.
Thereafter, this Board, with this Referee sitting, in Award 24861 - the
first of the six pending disputes involving the same issue - after reviewing
Award 22912 and the contracts, arguments and facts in Award 24861, concluded
that the opinion reached in Award 22912 was correct. In so doing, this Hard
determined that, contrary to the Carrier's argument, Article 36 was not adopted
unchanged in Rule 67 as regards the issue in dispute, and that read in the context
of Rule 75, "the express and ambiguous language of Rule 67, with no stated exception
comporting with the Carrier's argument," does not allow Yardmasters to "tear-off"
and/or "separate" switch lists.
s
Having found the claims to be sustained, this Board next addressed the
question of appropriate remedy. In agreeing with Referee Kasher's remedy of
three-hour call pay in Award 22912, this Board noted that while "some may regard
such payment as excessive,"
"...the clear meaning of language may be enforced even though the
results are harsh or contrary to the original expectations of one of
the parties. In such cases, the result is based upon the clear
language of the contract, rot upon the equities involved."
Continuity in the interpretation of contract rules is highly desirable,
and such interpretations should rot be overruled without strong and compelling
reasons. There is
nothing presented
in the consideration of the instant decision
which in any meaningful way can serve to distinguish the rationale of the decision
in this dispute from that in Award 22912 since it involves interpretation of
contract language. The parties are the same, the agreement is the same, and the
facts are virtually identical. Having assessed the intent of the parties as
evidenced by tlea contract language, we conclude that the opinion reached in Award
22912, as confirmed in Award 24861, is the correct one.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds and holds:
Award Number 24862
Dock -t Number CL-24007 Page 5
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively
Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved
June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was violated.
A W A R D
Claim sustained in accordance with the opinion.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Thizd Division
ATTEST:
Nancy J.
vl~'
- Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 28th day of June, 1984