NATIONAL
RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number MW-25130
Thomas F. Carey, Referee
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Consolidated Rail Corporation
(New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company)
STATEMENT
OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The Carrier without just and sufficient cause and on the basis
of unproven charges, improperly disciplined Trackman G. Deyab on charges that
(a) he alleged left the work site without proper authority
and failed to comply with instructions from Supervisor
E. P. Arrendondo at Providence, Rhode Island on March 2,
1981 (System Docket No. NH-82);
(b) he was allegedly absent from duty without authority on
March 3, 4, 5 and 6, 1981 (System Docket No. NH-83).
(2) The claimant's record shall be cleared of the charges leveled
against him and he shall be compensated for all wage loss suffered."
OPINION OF BOARD: On March 2, 1981, Mr. R. G. Deyab, a trackman with five
and one-half (5-1/2) years service, was instructed to
install timbers at the Gas House Switch, South Providence Yard. Mr. Deyab
confronted the Supervisor-Track and said it was too much work for three men.
The Claimant was advised to do the job as assigned. Upon his refusal, the
Claimant left the work site on his own accord and, in addition, remained absent
from duty for four (4) additional days (March 3-6, 1981).
The discipline assessed to the Claimant was ten (10) working days,
March 2, 1981 through March 13, 1981, as suspension with regard to the charge
of insubordination, and an additional three (3) working days, March 16-18,
1981, as suspension due to absenteeism.
The record states clearly Claimant left the work site without
proper authority and failed to comply with a direct instruction from his
Supervisor at Providence, R. I. on March 2, 1981. Such refusal constitutes an
act of insubordination. It is well settled that employes must comply with
instructions and then complain later.
In addition, the record indicates that the Claimant did not, in fact,
report for work on March 3, 4, 5, and 6, 1981. It is the duty and obligation
of the employe to make himself available to perform service at the assigned
time and, therefore, he must be held responsible for his absence during the
period involved.
Award Number 24947 Page 2
Locket Number MW-25130
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway SLabor Act
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
Jib
Nancy ver - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 14th day of August 1984.
ri.
C. . C i ,