NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-24359
Herbert L. Marx, Jr., Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks,
PARTIES TO DISPUTE: ( Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes
(Cincinnati, New Orleans and Texas Pacific Railway Company
( (Southern Railway System)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood (GL-9518)
that:
Carrier violated the Agreement at Cincinnati, Ohio, when on September
11, 1979, it permitted Mr. A. A. Farria, Jr., a former Clerical employee, to
displace Relief Clerk B. A. Miller.
For this violation, the Carrier shall now be required to compensate
Relief Clerk B. A. Miller for all monetary losses sustained as a result of that
erroneous displacement, beginning on September 11, 1979, and continuing until
such time she is permitted to return to her proper position; and compensate her
at the rate of time and one-half for all services required of her on the assigned
rest days of her proper position, specifically, Thursdays and Fridays, beginning
on September 13, 1979, and continuing until she is returned to her proper position
of Relief Clerk.
OPINION OF BOARD: A. A. Farria acquired Clerk seniority on June 6, 1977. He
worked in a Clerk position until July 28, 1978, at which
time he accepted a position as a Special Agent in the Carrier's Department of
Police and Special Services. He was released from this position on September 11,
1979. At that time, he acted to exercise his claimed Clerk seniority to displace
a less senior Clerk, B. A. Miller, the Claimant herein. Carrier permitted this
displacement, crediting Farria with his June 6, 1977 Clerk seniority.
Farria's name was carried on the 1978 Clerk seniority roster, but it
was not included on the July 1, 1979 Clerk seniority roster. The Organization
infers from the absence of his name in the 1979 list that Farria had lost Clerk
seniority upon assuming his Special Agent position. The Carrier, on the other
hand, states that the omission of his name from the 1979 roster was simply an
error. It was restored to the 1980 and subsequent lists.
The Organization argues, therefore, that Farria improperly displaced
Miller. It cites numerous awards supporting the theory that employes may not
continue to acquire seniority in different crafts or classes simultaneously,
except where such is specifically provided by agreement.
The Board finds, however, that the Carrier acted properly and in conformance
with the Agreement, which provides in pertinent part as follows:
Award Number 24961 Page 2
Docket Number CL-24359
"RULE B-3 -- SENIORITY LISTS
(b) Names of employees retaining seniority rights under Rule B-5 shall
be carried on the roster and an asterisk (*) shall be placed before
such names to properly designate them. The omission of the names of
such employees from such rosters shall not, however, operate to affect
their seniority in any way . . . .N
'RULE B-5 --PROMOTION TO OFFICIAL OR
EXCEPTED POSITIONS
(a) Employees covered by this agreement who have heretofore been
promoted to and now occupy official or excepted positions with the
carrier, or positions with the Organization, occupying their entire
time, and employees who may hereafter be promoted to any such positions
either with the carrier or the Organization shall retain all their
rights and continue to accumulate seniority in the districts from which
promoted. When official or excepted positions are filled by other than
employees holding seniority under the respective rules of this agreement,
no seniority shall be established by such employment to positions
covered by the scope of this agreement.
(b) Employees holding seniority rights under section (a) of this Rule
shall, in the event they are demoted, laid off or have occasion to
leave their position account of circumstances beyond their election, be
privileged to exercise a displacement right under schedule rules,
provided they avail themselves of this opportunity within thirty (30)
days. If they desire to return to a schedule position because of their
own election, they may assert their seniority only by bidding on
vacancies, provided that they must exercise such right by bidding upon
the first vacancy open, to which their seniority and qualifications
entitle them, after so demoting themselves."
The Carrier maintains, without
convincing contradiction,
that the
position of Special Agent has by continuous custom and practice been considered
one of the "official and excepted positions" referred to in Rule B-5(a). This
rule provides for the right to "continue to accumulate seniority in the districts
from which promoted". Rule B-3 provides, as to employes retaining seniority
rights, that "omission
...
from such rosters (as occurred to Farria in 19791
shall not
...
operate to affect their seniority in any way".
The Organization has failed to show that Farria's situation was other
than as covered by the above cited rules. Having maintained his employment with
the Carrier throughout, Farria's right to displace a less senior employe in a
Clerk position is clearly established.
This decision is not intended as a precedent on any other Carrier.
Award Number 24961 Page 3
Locket Number CL-24359
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as
approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
Nancy J. - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 14th day of August 1984.