NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number MW-2472
Robert W. McAllister, Referee
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Colorado and Southern Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1l The dismissal of Track Laborer L. E. Garcia for alleged violation
of 'Rules 661, 664 and 6671 was without just and sufficient cause and an abuse of
justice and discretion by the Carrier (System File C-11-81 /MW-436).
(2) The claimant shall be reinstated with seniority and all other
rights unimpaired, his record be cleared and he shall be compensated for all wage
loss suffered."
OPINION OF BOARD: The Claimant, L. E. Garcia, at the time of his dismissal,
was employed as a track laborer. As a result of an incident
on April 14, 1981, he was charged with insubordination and the performance of
unsafe acts. An investigation was held, and Claimant's dismissal was formalized
by letter of April 30, 1981.
The Organization protests the Carrier's actions and argues that, even
if Carrier's view of the incident was accepted, the transcript firmly establishes
the Claimant's actions were provoked by the foreman. On April 14, the Claimant
was assigned to the task of cleaning off ties with a shovel. At about 10:00
A. M., he was seen in a standing position and told by the foreman to clean the
ties off. This order was repeated several times. The Claimant testified he was
waiting because people were in his way. Foreman Theret's testimony confirms this
statement. Notwithstanding, the Claimant, according to Theret, started cursing
and threw his shovel down. The Claimant stated he told Theret "... well how in
the f--- am 1 supposed to clean that goddamn track when there's three f------ men
on there.' The Claimant charges that, at this point, the foreman told him he was
fired and admits he got 'pretty upset".
The Organization views this incident as provocation by the foreman and
a reaction by Claimant. Even assuming the transcript supports the Organization's
belief the foreman was impatient and the Claimant had a reasonable basis for
being unable to immediately comply with the foreman's orders, the Board is unable
to conclude the Claimant's reactions were justified. The evidence clearly
establishes the Claimant threw his shovel down and that it struck a rail and
bounced back in the air. Secondly, the Claimant, by his own admission, directed
abusive language at Foreman Theret and testified he was "ready for fighting".
When viewed in its entirety, the Claimant's conduct cannot be termed to be other
than insubordinate. If, as asserted, the foreman's impatience to get a job done
was unreasonable under the circumstances, the only avenue of correction was the
filing of a grievance. The Claimant may have been frustrated, but his reactions
were inordinate to the situation. His language was foul and abusive. Throwing
his shovel was an act which risked the safety of bystanders. The Claimant is
Award Number 24962 Page 2
Docket Number MW-24723
a relatively short term employe. There is no basis upon which to condone his
actions, which, in totality, constitute insubordination. The record substantially
supports the action taken by the Carrier.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Mnployes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as
approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
z
Nancy J. -Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 14th day of August 1984.
n
m
r.,
t .
C,'` C.`
o .