PARTIES TO DISPUTE:


STATEMENT OF CLAIM: 'Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:

(1) The dismissal of Trackman Nathan Shorter for alleged absenteeism on December 28, 29 and 30, 1981 and January 4, 1982 was without just and sufficient cause (System File 37-AWP-82-6/12-39(82-1021) K3).

(2) The claimant shall be reinstated with seniority and all other rights unimpaired and he shall be compensated for all wage loss suffered."

OPINION OF BOARD: Prior to his dismissal by the Carrier, Claimant was employed
as a trackman, working under the supervision of Surfacing
Gang Foreman J. D. Stephens. He had entered the Carrier's service on October
20, 1980.On January 6, 1982, he was notified by the Division Engineer:













By agreement, the investigation was postponed and rescheduled for 10:00 A. M., January 20, 1982. Claimant was not present at the appointed time of 10:00 A.M., nor did he ask for further postponement of the hearing. The officials involved in the hearing decided to wait thirty minutes to see whether Claimant appeared. Claimant did not appear, but called by telephone and talked

                      Docket Number MW-25022


to the Assistant Conducting Officer and the General Chairman of the Organization, but made no request that the investigation be further postponed. The investigation was, therefore, conducted in the absence of the Claimant. The Board has issued numerous awards upholding the conducting of investigations in absentia. We consider Claimant's failure to appear at the January 20, 1982 investigation, or to request a postponement, was at his peril.

There was substantial evidence presented in the investigation, a transcript of which has been made a part of the record, in support of the charge that Claimant did not protect his assignment on the dates shown in the letter of charge. It was also shown that Claimant's prior absentee record was far from satisfactory.

Based on the evidence before the Board, there is no proper basis to interfere with the discipline imposed by the Carrier.

FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the parties
to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:

That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and

        That the Agreement was not violated.


                      A W A R D


        Claim denied.


                        _ NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                        By Order of Third Division


ATTEST: '
        Nancy ver - Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 26th day of September 1984.