NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number MW-24711
Ida Klaus, Referee
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The twenty-two (22) days of suspension imposed upon Truck
Operator J. J. Wilson for alleged insubordination on May 14, 1981 was
without just and sufficient cause and on the basis of unproven charges
(System File TRRA 1981-10).
(2) The claimant's record shall be cleared of the charge
leveled against him and he shall be compensated for all wage loss
suffered including overtime pay.
OPINION OF BOARD: The 22 day suspension of the Claimant for insubordination
toward his foreman on May 14, 1981, is protested on
the ground that the Carrier has failed to prove the charge.
It is clear from the' Claimant's testimony that he was twice
directed to go out and start his assignment for the day and that he twice
refused. He sat in the foreman's office, insisting that he wanted the
truck brought over to him so that he could avoid stepping into deep water.
He did comply belatedly.
The evidence plainly suggests that the Claimant's negative
attitude was caused by the factually incorrect criticism leveled at him
by the foreman about being irresponsible in putting away his work tools.
That remark brought on a heated exchange between them and some disrespectful
and angry remarks from the Claimant. The Board does not, however, see in
those remarks any threat to the foreman.
The Board concludes that the weight of the evidence supports
the charge of insubordination. We find, however, that the penalty was
excessive in view of the foreman's part in bringing about the Claimant's
misconduct. We consider that a reasonable penalty in the circumstances
is a reduced suspension from the 22 days assessed to ZZ days.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all
the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
Award Number 25015 Page 2
Docket Number MW-24711
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the discipline was excessive.
A W A R D
Claim sustained in accordance with the opinion.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
Nancy J. r - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 26th day of September 1984.