NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number MW-24920
Eckehard Muessig, Referee
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Consolidated Rail Corporation (former
Penn Central
( Transportation Company)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The dismissal of Trackman J. R. Farrabee for alleged 'Attempted
falsification of personal injury allegedly sustained at Loudonville,
Ohio
on
August 17, 1979 at approximately 1:00 PM' was without just and sufficient cause
and on the basis of unproven charges (System Docket 556).
(2) The claimant shall be reinstated with seniority and all other
rights unimpaired, his record cleared and he shall be compensated for all wage
loss suffered."
OPINION OF BOARD: The Claimant attended a trial held on January 17, 1980, on
charges that he "attempted falsification of personal injury
allegedly sustained at Loudonville,
Ohio,
on August 17, 1979 at approximately
1:00 p.m." Following the investigation, the Claimant was notified that he had
been found guilty of the charges and was dismissed from the Carrier's service.
The Organization essentially advances a basic contention, and provides
numerous well-stated examples and citations in oral arguments before us and in
the record in support thereof, that the Carrier did not meet its heavy burden
of proof required of a dismissal action.
Key to the Carrier's finding of guilt is the construction it places
upon testimony adduced at the hearing. It essentially concluded from this
record that the Claimant had not been injured, as he claimed. The Board recognizes
the divergence of opinion and conflict concerning portions of the testimony of
record. However, there is no basis for holding that the Carrier abused its
discretion when it chose to believe whom it did. There is no basis herein to
disturb the well-established principle that it is the Carrier's role to determine
the credibility of witnesses. Accordingly, the claim is denied.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the parties
to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
Award Number 25020 Page 2
Docket Number MW-24920
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
Nancy J.
AVKr
- Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 26th day of September 1984.