PARTIES TO DISPUTE:


STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:

(1l The Carrier improperly withheld Laborer Otto Lindner from service for the period beginning on May 5, 1981 and extending through July 22, 1981 (System File CN24/D-2513).

(2) The claimant shall be compensated for all wage loss suffered, including overtime pay, sixty (60) days retroactive from August 15, 1981."

OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant herein had been on furlough and was recalled
to a new position, on May 21, 1981. He was examined by his physician on June 4, 1981 and the results of that examination were received by Carrier's medical department on June 8, 1981. On June 16, 1981, the Medical Services Department requested additional information from Claimant's Doctor which was received by Carrier on July 6, 1981. Carrier thereafter advised Claimant to return to work on July 24, 1981. It was based on this period of time from the initial job assignment until July 24th that the Claim is founded.

There is no question but that Carrier had the right to investigate and then review the medical data concerning this Claimant. However, there is the concommitant obligation for Carrier to move with reasonable speed to come to its conclusions, since the employe's rights and ability to work are at stake. In this case, based on the record, there is no apparent reason for the lengthy time frame required to review the necessary medical data. It would appear that a week to review the supplemental data required in this case, and supplied on July 6th, should have been sufficient to make the determination. Under all the circumstances, therefore, Claimant shall be awarded nine days pay for the inordinately long period of time required by Carrier to make the medical determination.





That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

                      Docket Number MW-24844


That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and

        That the Agreement was violated.


                      A W A R D


        Claim sustained in accordance with the Opinion.


                          NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                          By Order of Third Division


ATTEST:
        Nancy Jll/er - Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 4th day of October 1984.