'' ~.' ' NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
Award Number 25094
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number SG-24182
Herbert Fishgold, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Missouri Pacific Railraod Company (former Texas and Pacific
( Railway Company)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claims of the General committee of the Brotherhood of
Railroad Signalmen on the Missouri Pacific Railraod Company
(former Texas and Pacific Railway Company):
Claim No. 1
Claim on behalf of Signal Maintainer A. H. Rogoski, Atlanta, Texas for
forty-eight (48) at time and one half his straight time hourly rate of $1943.27
per month. Carrier violated the Scope Rule and Rule 62 of the current Signalmen's
Agreement by allowing other than covered employees to install 'Railroad Crossing'
signs and track signs on highway crossing signals.
(Carrier file No. K 315-186)
Claim No. 2
Claim on behalf of Signal Maintainer A. H. Rogoski, Big Sandy, Texas for
eight (8) hours at time and one half his straight time hourly rate $1943.27 per
month. Carrier violated the Scope Rule and Rule 62 of the current Signalmen's
Agreement by allowing other than covered employees to install 'Railroad Crossing'
signs and track signs on highway crossing signals.
(Carrier file No. K 315-186)"
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimants are employed in Carrier's Signal Department. During
the week of November 18, 1979, employes of the Century Fence
Company installed highway signs intended to warn motorists of a railroad crossing
and to indicate the number of railroad tracks which the highway crosses at that
particular location. The contractor installed such signs at six locations on the
signal maintenance district assigned to one of the Claimants. On November 16,
1979, employes of an unidentified contracting firm installed "Railroad Crossing"
signs at one location on the signal maintenance district assigned to the other
Claimant.
Petitioner claims (without denial by the Carrier) that under the
Agreement the work of installing highway crossing protective devices was reserved
to the Carrier's Signal Employes. The Organization claims that in allowing the
employes of Century Fence Company and the unidentified contracting firm to perform
signal work, the Carrier violated the Agreement.
i`R
c
Award Number 25094 Pa
4(01/ 1,9 1984
Docket Number SG-24182
\\\cE-8N'U&
The record contains no probative evidence that the Carrier authorize
or "allowed" the work in question to be performed by the employes of Century Fence
or the unidentified contractor; the Carrier denies that it gave any permission or
authority for the work. There is even some question as to Carrier's knowledge of
the work till after the fact.
This Board has considered a claim in Award Number 19595, wherein Referee
Lieberman noted:
"In Award No. 18626 we held:
... if any work was performed on Erie-Lackawanna property or equipment,
it was performed without the consent or agreement of Erie-Lackawanna
Railroad. Therefore, the burden of proof shifted to the Organization
to disprove Carrier's contentions. The record is void of any such proof
and it must be concluded that the Organization has failed to sustain its
burden. To hold Carrier responsible for Monon's unauthorized act would
place Carrier in an indefensible position. See Awards 9847, 10549,
12907, 14888, and 14889 among many others.
We shall reaffirm the position which we have taken in a long line of
cases that conduct of third parties which is not authorized by the
Carrier cannot serve as a proper basis for claims such as in this case."
There is nothing presented in the consideration of the instant decision
which in any meaningful way can serve to distinguish the rationale of the decision
in this dispute from that in Award 19595. Accordingly, we conclude that the
opinion reached in Award 19595 is hereby confirmed.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
`i
7~n''
4 ~~ ~
ATTEST: `Gc~UG~
G
Nancy J. Dever - Executive Secretary
f
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 23rd day of October, 1984.