NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
- Award Number 25143
THIRD DIVISION Locket Number MW-23993
Wesley A. Wildman, Referee
(Brotherhood of maintenance of way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Soo Line Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The five (5) days of suspension imposed upon Section Foreman
Norman Nelson for alleged violation of 'Rule 107· was arbitrary, unwarranted
and on the basis of unproven charges (Carrier's File 800-16-A-63).
(2) The claimants record be cleared of the charge leveled against
him and reimbursement be made for all wage loss suffered and for mileage expense
incurred traveling between Sheldon and Stevens Point, Wisconsin.
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant in this case is a Section Foreman with an unblemished
record of thirty-two years of service with Carrier. At the
end of a day of rail loading, Claimant delegated to one of his crew the task of
placing a motor car on a spur while Claimant completed some necessary paperwork
in the section shelter. The section laborer asked to secure the motor car for
the night was acknowledged by all to be a qualified and responsible employe.
Unfortunately, following the transfer and securing of the motor car, the switch
used was left lined for the spur rather than being lined and locked for the
main. This was, of course, a serious violation of an important operating Rule,
104(a):
'Unless otherwise provided, the normal position
of a main track switch is on the main track and
must be lined and locked in that position accept
(sic) when changed for immediate movement.'
In addition to (.presumably) meting out discipline to the section
laborer involved, Carrier imposed a five working day suspension without pay on
Claimant for violation of operating Rule 107, which provides:
'After using a switch, the employee in charge must
see that the switch is returned immediately to its
normal position and locked and that points fit.
Other employees must check with each other to see
that this is done.'
The Organization representing Claimant asserts that a foreman is
unarguably justified in asking a qualified employe to perform the kind of
equipment moving and switching chore involved here, and that a foreman is not
obligated by Rule 107, or normally expected in practice, to check on and
personally verify the correct performance of every detail and aspect of the
task assigned.
Award Number 25143 Page 2
Docket Number MW-23993
Clearly, it could be inappropriate for us to attempt here to define a
section foreman's full supervisory responsibility, under any or all circumstances,
with respect to Rule 107. However, where, as here, the switch in question is
in close physical proximity to the section shelter and where, as here, Claimant
acknowledges that it is his normal practice to check this switch under the
circumstances prevailing on the day in question, it does not seem to us unreasonable
to ask that the foreman share the responsibility for this potentially disastrous
incident with the employe who was proximately negligent in carrying out his
duties.
Finally, despite Claimant's long and distinguished record of service
with the carrier, we do not find the discipline of a five corking day suspension
without pay to be arbitrary, capricious, or unnecessarily harsh.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest: .
r/ Nancy f.~ver - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois this 9th day of November 1984.