NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Locket Number SG-24846
I. M. Lieberman, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Burlington Northern (St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the General Committee of the Brotherhood of
Railroad Signalmen on the former St. Louis-San Francisco
Railway Company:
In behalf of Mr. B. J. Curry, Jr. for compensation for all time
lost, including overtime, from 8:00 A. M. February 27, 1981, to 8:00 A. M.,
April 27, 1981; reinstatement of all employment rights, including seniority
rights and vacation rights; and to remove any reference of this incident from
his personal record, account Mr. Curry being unjustly held from service due
to alleged violation of part of Rule 176 of the Maintenance of Way and Structures
Rule book.· (Carrier file: SI 81-10-20)
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant herein, following an investigation, having been
charged with insubordination, was accorded a sixty day
suspension. The record indicates that the circumstances related to an instruction
to Claimant to load some batteries into his supervisor's station wagon. Carrier
alleges that Claimant refused repeatedly to comply with direct orders of his
supervisor and only after the supervisor told him he was removed from service
did he begin to load the batteries.
Petitioner insists first that Claimant was not afforded a fair
hearing and furthermore that his supervisor had been harassing Claimant.
Additionally, it is urged that Claimant refused to obey his supervisor's
order due to safety considerations. Carrier disagrees with these contentions.
The record does not support Petitioner's contention that the hearing
was not properly conducted. While the hearing officer precluded certain
evidence offered with respect to past history offered by the Organization, we
do not believe that constituted prejudicial error (see Award 20865). An
examination of the transcript indicates that Claimant and his representatives
were given an ample opportunity to mount a defense and the hearing was fairly
conducted. With regard to the contention concerning harassment, the record
does not support Petitioner's position that this had any bearing, if indeed
true, on the issue herein.
Claimant's principle defense is that he felt the car should be
moved and it was unsafe to load the batteries in the location provided by his
superior. The only reference to safety was that there were several ruts to
be crossed in carrying the batteries; no other evidence was presented to
support the safety argument. On the contrary, there was evidence that the
supervisor attempted to position the car as close to the material to be loaded
as possible and could not improve upon the car's location without jeopardy to
the vehicle. From the entire record, it appears that Claimant's motivation
in his apparent refusal to do the job as ordered, was that the location was
not as convenient as he thought it could be and was on a prior occasion. The
record is quite clear in that he admitted that he refused to comply with
instructions.
Award Number 25207 Page 2
Docket Number SG-24846
Insubordination is a serious offense. It is obvious that there are
many degress of severity in the infraction so characterized. In this instance
the charges were supported by substantial evidence including Claimant's admissions.
Under the circumstances, and based on the entire record, the discipline appears
to be commensurate with the severity of the offense. The claim must be denied.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
Nancy
Jr 169
ver - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 11th day of January 1985.
\w