NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-24791
Rodney E. Dennis, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks,
( Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood (GL-9646) that:
(1) Carrier violated the Clerk-Telegrapher Agreement when, on June
20, 1980, it imposed thirty (30) days' suspension from Carrier's service to Mr.
W. C. Ebberts, Material Distributor, Baltimore, Maryland, following the leveling
of charges on May 15, 1980, and Carrier failed to conduct the investigation
within the time-frame agreed-to by the Parties and it issued a disciplinary
decision that was unreasonable, arbitrary, capricious and discriminatory, and
(2) As a result of such improper action, Carrier shall be required
to compensate Claimant W. C. Ebberts for all wages lost between the suspension
period of June 20, 1980, through and including July 19, 1980, and that Mr.
Ebbert's service record be cleared of the charges and disciplinary measures
therefrom.
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant W. C. Ebberts is a Material Handler employed by
Carrier at its Riverside Facility in Baltimore, Maryland.
On May 12, 1980, while on duty at the Riverside stores supply room, he became
involved in an altercation with Conductor Davis over the use of the telephone.
On May 15, 1980, Claimant, as well as the Conductor involved, was ordered to
appear at a hearing into the matter. Claimant was charged as follows:
You are charged with responsibility in connection
with personal injury sustained by Conductor G. Davis
at Riverside, Baltimore, Maryland, approximately 8:30 P. M.
Attend a hearing at 9:00 a.m. on May 20, 1980.
The hearing was convened as scheduled and upon the request of Conductor
Davis, it was adjourned. The hearing was eventually reconvened and ultimately
conducted on June 2, 1980. A transcript of the hearing has been made a part of
the record of this case. A review of that record reveals that Claimant and
Conductor Davis did engage in a verbal altercation and that there was some
pushing and shoving by each man. Carrier concluded at the conclusion of the
hearing that Claimant's involvement in the incident called for a thirty (30)
day suspension and that Conductor Davis was deserving of a ten (10) day suspension
for his part in the incident.
Award Number 25275 Page 2
Locket Number CL-24791
This Board has carefully reviewed the total record of this case and
concludes that the Claimant received a full hearing and was afforded all rights
guaranteed by Agreement. It also reveals that both Claimant and Conductor
Davis were aggressors in the confrontation. The record does not support Carrier's
decision to administer discipline in this case in an unequal manner. The record
reveals that Conductor Davis provoked Claimant by making a telephone call to
the Trainmaster and inventing a complaint. This behavior was provocative and
doubtlessly was a major cause of the problem. It is axiomatic in industrial
discipline that like employes who commit like offenses should receive like
discipline. We feel that that principle should apply here. We are therefore
reducing the thirty (30) day suspension to a ten (10) day suspension. Claimant
shall be reimbursed for all lost wages beyond the ten (10) day suspension.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively
Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved
June 21, 1934;,
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the discipline was excessive.
A W A R D
Claim sustained in accordance with the Opinion.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:
ancy J. v -Executive Secretary -
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 28th day of February 1985. v(4
L
\ J u ) 1
\CQl i
L,
L;.