(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes PARTIES TO DISPUTE:


STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:

(1l The ten (10) days of suspension imposed upon Trackman M. L. Peterman for alleged violation of Rules "661 and 667" was without just and sufficient cause and on the basis of unproven charges (System File C-23-81/MW444).

(2) The claimant's record shall be cleared and he shall be compensated for all wage loss suffered, including overtime pay.

OPINION OF BOARD: While working a crossing at Berthoud, Colorado, Claimant
M. L. Peterman, a Section Laborer, was directed by his
Foreman to help pick up a railroad tie to place under the track. Carrier
contends that Claimant refused this order. Claimant was subsequently charged
with a violation of Safety Rules 661 and 667 for his insubordinate behavior.
He was assessed a ten (10) day penalty. This Board has reviewed the hearing
record in this case and must conclude that Claimant was insubordinate in that
he did refuse to follow the Foreman's order. For this infraction, a ten (10)
day suspension is not arbitrary or capricious. This Board shall therefore deny
this claim.





That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and





        Claim denied.


                          NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                          By Order of Third Division


Attest:
        Nancy ver - Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 28th day of February 1985.