PARTIES TO DISPUTE:


STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:

Claimant Machine Operator G. L. Burks shall be reimbursed for all overtime compensation loss suffered by'him as a result of being improperly suspended from the Carrier's service September 14 through September 28, 1981, both dates inclusive (System File MW-82-23/336-89-A).

OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant G. L. Burks was a Machine Operator in Carrier's
employ at Dayton, Texas. He was suspended from service on
September 14, 1981, and returned to service on September 29, 1981. His suspension
resulted from charges of insubordination. Those charges were dropped by Carrier
and Claimant was paid at the pro rata rate for all time lost. Claimant now
seeks pay for lost overtime,opportunity during the period that he was unjustly
suspended. ,.

Petitioner bases its request for lost overtime on Article 14(e), wherein it states that payment will be made for assigned working hours actually lost at the rate of pay of the Position formerly held. Claimant contends that his machine worked overtime during the period that he was suspended and that if he had been working, he would have earned the overtime pay.

Carrier takes the position that a settlement was arrived at in Claimant's insubordination case on the property and that the demand for overtime payments is inappropriate at this time.

We have reviewed the record before us and have concluded that Carrier properly settled the insubordination case against Claimant. An additional request for lost overtime is not appropriate. This Board has, on numerous occasions, remarked about the speculative nature of lost overtime claims and has generally denied them. We find no sound basis in the record before us in this case to do otherwise.






                    Docket Number MW-24856


That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and

        That the Agreement was not violated.


                        A W A R D


        Claim denied.


                          NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                          By Order of Third Division


Attest: /~c/ ~y fC .
      -' Nancy J. r - Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 28th day of February 1985.,