NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Locket Number CL-24024
Herbert Fishgold, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks,
( Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood (GL-9394) that:
(1) Carrier violated the Agreement between the Parties when it erroneously
determined that Yard Clerk P. A. Walker used intoxicants on June 27, 1979, and
it suspended him from service for sixty (60) days, and,
(2) Carrier, because of such wrongful action, shall reverse the
decision rendered assessing discipline, exonerate Mr. Walker of involved
charges and compensate him in accordance with the provisions of Rule 47 of the
Agreement during the sixty (60) days suspended, commencing June 27, 1979.
OPINION OF BOARD: Mr. P. A. Walker, Yard Clerk, Glenwood Yard, Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania, scheduled
duty hours of 3:00 p. m. to 11:00
p.m., June 27, 1979, was relieved from duty and held from service at 7:00 p. m.
that date by Chief Yard Clerk J. A. Morganstern, Glenwood Yard, under instructions
given to him by Yardmaster D. Bendick, Glenwood Yard, by reason of Mr. Walker's
alleged use of intoxicants at Roth's Tavern, located approximately 1000 feet
from Glenwood Yard Office.
Walker, who was employed by the Carrier in 1969, was served with a
notice of hearing involving the following charge:
"You are charged with the use of intoxicants at Roth's
Tavern, 74 Vespucius Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15207, at
or about 6:30 p.m. on June 27, 1979."
Following an investigative hearing, Claimant was given a 60-day
suspension.
The record of the hearing presents a conflict in testimony. Claimant
states that he was in the Tavern "to buy lunch in anticipation of possible
additional time after (his) regular tour of duty". He acknowledges that he had
been in the Tavern sitting at the bar for approximately ten (10) minutes, but
denies having a drink, even though there may have been a beer in front of him.
Although Claimant maintains that he had ordered a sandwich in advance of
arriving at the Tavern, there was no evidence of any food in front of him, nor
did he proffer this explanation at the time. Both Morganstern and Bendick
testified that they saw a glass of beer and bottle of Rolling Rock in front of
Claimant, and that no one else was sitting next to him. They also acknowledged
that they did not observe Claimant purchase a drink or actually drink anything,
nor did he appear to be intoxicated.
Award Number 25446 Page 2
Locket Number CL-24024
It is unfortunate that neither Morganstern nor Bendick asked Claimant
what he was doing in the bar or whose beer was in front of him. However, as
this Board noted in Award No. 19928:
°...(It)t is not our function to determine the credibility
of witnesses nor weigh the evidence, when there is valid
and sufficient evidence, even though denied, to support
Carrier's decision. We have reiterated this principal (sic) in
many Awards... ·
With their responsibility to the public, railroads have generally
quite properly considered the use of intoxicants to be an extremely serious
offense. Indeed, this Board has found dismissal is appropriate under the rules
for this infraction. Accordingly, we do not find that the imposition of a 60day suspension in this c
substitute our judgment for the disciplinary action taken by the Carrier and
the claim must be denied.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively
Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved
June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attes
Nancy- ver - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 23rd day of May 1985.