NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Locket Number CL-25346
Herbert L. Marx, Jr., Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks,
( Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Delaware and Hudson Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood (GL-9810) that:
1. Carrier violated Rule 21 - Extra Boards and paragraph 2(c) of Memorandum
of Agreement covering establishment,
maintenance and
operation of Extra Boards
when, on April 23 and 24, 1980, Position Machine Operator-Yard Clerk at Whitehall,
N. Y., 2300 hours was vacant. No Extra Clerk was available. Trainmaster Welch
marked furloughed
employee Charpentier
on Extra Board to cover the vacancy.
2. Claimant Carswell was qualified, available but not called for these
vacancies. Therefore, Claimant Carswell should be compensated at the time and
one-half rate eight hours each day April 23 and 24,.1980. (44-80, 45-80)
OPINION OF BOARD: A vacancy existed in a Relief Clerk Position on April 23-24,
1980. The Carrier states that the Extra Board had been reduced
to one employe prior to this
event, by
mutual consent with the Organization. The
one Extra Board member was unavailable to fill the vacancy. The Carrier then
called in a furloughed employe to cover the vacancy.
The organization argues that the vacancy should have been filled on an
overtime basis by the Claimant, who was available for the
assignment.
The Carrier's first written denial of the claim was "account no basis'.
The second level denial merely stated: 'We do not agree with any of the
instances
that the Clerks Rules were violated'. The denial at the level of SuperintendentLabor Relation
'Decision: As Superintendent-Administration
advised in his August 4, 1980
denial to you:
'*** This was merely an
increase of
an extra board
when there was obviously a need to do so. Extra boards
are reduced and increased all over this railroad as the
needs decrease and
increase. ***'
There was no rule violation as alleged.
Claim is without merit and rule support and is denied.'
Award Number 25502 Page 2
Locket Number CL-25346
As pointed out by the organization, the memorandum of Agreement in
connection with
Rule 21, EXTRA BOARDS, reads in pertinent part:
'2. (c) Any increase or decrease in the number of
of Extra Board employes at a given point shall be subject
to mutual agreement of the parties hereto, and shall be
established as provided in paragraphs 2(a) and (b). In
case of reduction, employes affected will be permitted
to exercise their seniority rights as provided in Rule 16
of the Clerks' Agreement.·
This directly contradicts the reasoning in the Superintendent-Labor
Relations reply.
In its Submission to the Board, the Carrier bases its defense on the
right to create an "emergency board" to cover vacancies. There is no record that
this argument was raised on the property or that this was contemplated in calling
in the furloughed employe. Thus, this is improperly set forth for the first time
before the Board. Further, it appears to contradict directly the Carrier's
reason offered at the highest level on the property.
The record thus shows no convincing answer to the organization's
contention
that a furloughed employe, not part of a then recognized Extra Board, was improperly
called to work in place of an available employe.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively
Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved
June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was violated.
A W A R D
Claim sustained.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:
Nancy J ~er - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 13th day of June 1985.