PARTIES TO DISPUTE:


STATEMENT OF CLAIM:

"Carrier violated the rules of the Clerks' Agreement and the Washington Agreement when my position of Record Clerk, Pos. No. A-26 was abolished May 1, 1981 and work was transferred to J. A. Binford's office in Richmond, Va. and Supt. of Transportation in Baltimore, Md. This work was not transferred to Car Accounting Office in Baltimore, as if that would make a difference under the contract.

I contend that I should have been given the right to transfer with my work or be given severance pay."

OPINION OF BOARD: The dispute in this matter involves the Ex Parte Submission
filed by the Claimant, E. F. Gibson, in which she alleges that
the August 1981 consolidation of Carrier's operations at Huntington, West
Virginia, and Baltimore, Maryland, violated the Clerks' Agreement and the
Washington Agreement. The Claimant contends that she should have been allowed by
the Carrier to follow her work or she should be given severance pay. The Carrier
contends that the handling of this claim was procedurally defective and that the
Board lacks jurisdiction to overturn the Agreement and interpretations thereof
which have been negotiated and agreed upon by the parties.

The Board finds that the Claimant failed to process her claim in accordance with the rules which prescribe the procedure for handling grievances. Agreement Rule 27 1/2 requires in pertinent part:





                    Docket Number MS-25350


In this instance, protest was filed by the Claimant on June 6, 1981, directly to BRAC President Kroll. There was no handling with the Carrier as required by Rule 27 1/2 prior to appeal to this Board. (See Third Division Awards No. 23581 and No. 19571 and Second Division Award No. 8642). Furthermore, there was no conference on the property between the parties to this dispute as required by Sections 152 Second and 153 First (i) of the Railway Labor Act. (See Third Division Award No. 11896 and Second Division Awards No. 6540 and No. 7155). In accordance with the applicable Rules and the Awards cited, the Board finds that this claim is procedurally defective. Thus the claim is precluded from consideration and must be dismissed.

        FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:


        That the parties waived oral hearing;


That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and

        That the claim is barred.


                        A W A R D


        Claim dismissed.


                          NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                          By Order of Third Division


        Attes , Nancy ./fiver - Executive Secretary


        Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 26th day of July 1985.