NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number 65J-25747
Stanley L. Aiges, Referee
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Consolidated Rail Corporation
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The disciplinary denntion of Track Foreman A. Bigelow and his
disqualification as track foreman and assistant track foreman for "alleged
improper reporting of overtime for yourself and your gang for Thursday, March
4, 1982· was without just and proper cause and on the basis of unpzoven
charges (System Locket CR-33(D)).
(2) Mr. A. Bigelow's seniority as track foreman and assistant track
foreman be restored and unimpaired and he shall be allowed the difference
between what he would have received at the track foreman's rate and what he
was paid in a lower rated position until he is returned to work as a track
foreman with seniority as such unimpaired.
OPINION OF BOARD: A. Bigelow was disqualified as a Track Foreman and Assistant
Track foreman for his alleged improper reporting of overtime
for him and his gang on March 4, 1982. No useful purpose will be served by
detailing the record produced in this case. Suffice it to say that the
record fully supports a finding that Claimant Bigelow is guilty of the
charges levied against him. Indeed, at the hearing, he freely admitted that
he had failed to report time he and his gang worked on March 4, 1982. His
actions clearly exposed him to appropriate disciplinary action.
We are convinced that the Carrier's decision to demote Claimant
Bigelow was warranted. However, we are no less convinced that permanent
demotion is an excessive penalty. The discipline imposed thus far has served
its purpose. Accordingly, we will order his seniority as Track Foreman and
Assistant Track Foreman restored unimpaired, but without compensation.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the parties
to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein; and
That the discipline was excessive.
Award Number 25584 Page 2
Locket Number MW-25747
A W A R D
Claim sustained in accordance with the opinion.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST
Nancy J D r - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 22nd day of August 1985.
1. tJ
,_
s
C