NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Locket Number SG-25732
Lamont E. Stallworth, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Consolidated Rail Corporation
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: ·C1aim of the General Committee of the Brotherhood of
Railroad Signalmen on Consolidated Rail Corporation.
The Carrier violated the Scope Rule of the current agreement when
it allowed supervisory personnel to perform work reserved to Signalmen.
Carrier should be required to compensate Claimant D. W. Carey for _
sixteen hours at the Signalmen's rate."
[Carrier file No. SD-2039-0 Eastern Case En(B)SI-283]
OPINION OF BOARD: The initial Claim handled on the property alleged that
G. R. Vaughn, Assistant Signal Supervisor, between
September 13, 1982 and September 17, 1982, made wiring changes to circuits
for signal 225-1 to accomodate a relocation of that signal, in violation of
the Scope Rule in the current working agreement which became effective
September 1, 1981. Claim was made on behalf of D. W. Carey, furloughed
signalman, for sixteen hours pay at the Signalman's rate. The Claim was
denied and thereafter was progressed up to and including the Senior Director
Labor Relations, who denied the Claim by a letter dated May 12, 1983. The
Claim is now properly before the Board.
Upon a careful consideration of the record in its entirety, the
Board concludes that the record fails to reflect any facts which show that
the subject work was performed in the manner complained of during the period
September 13, 1982 and September 17, 1982, and the record also fails to
reflect any instance thereafter of the subject work having been performed in
the manner complained of on any date covered by the Submissions. The record
is thus barren of the requisite evidence to support the Claim and the Claim
must therefore be denied.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
Award Number 25638 Page 2
Locket Number SG-25732
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:
Nancy
opr e r - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois this 19th day of September 1985.
~E\V
ED
\
1-cago 0%