NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-25314
Robert W. McAllister, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks,
(Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood (GL-9830)
that:
"1. Carrier violated the Clerks' Rules Agreement, when it physically
moved Mr. E. B. Zielinski from his regular assigned position of Job No. 20-Keypunch,
CP Jct., Madison Yard to position of Job No. 50 Customer Service at North end
Eastbound at Madison Yard, a distance on one-eighth of a mile on date of November
30, 1982 and failed to properly compensate him. (Carrier's file 013-297-2).
2. Carrier's action was arbitrary and unreasonable due to facts
involved.
3. Carrier shall now be required to compensate Mr. Zielinski the
amount of $88.43 for date of November 30, 1982, representing the daily rate of pay
of his regular position, Job No. 20, Keypunch, due to Carrier's arbitrary and
unreasonable action."
OPINION OF BOARD: The Claimant, E. B. Zielinski, holds a regular assignment,
Job No. 20 Keypunch, 7:00 A. M. to 3:00 P. M. Monday through
Friday. The rate of pay is $88.43 per day. On November 30, 1982, the occupant of
Position No. 50, Customer Service, was off due to sickness. At approximately 8:00
A. M. on the 30th, the Claimant was moved from his regular position to fill the
absent Customer Service employee's job which has a daily rate of $103.24. The
Claimant's job was blanked. The Claimant was qualified to fill the higher rated
position.
The Organization claims the Carrier violated Rule 65, Guarantee. In
pertinent part, it states:
"(a) Regularly assigned employees shall receive one day's pay within
each twenty-four (24) hour period, according to location occupied
or to which entitled, if ready for service and not used, or if
required on duty less than eight (8) hours as per location, except
on assigned rest days and holiday."
Award Number 25654 Page 2
Locket Number CL-25314
Essentially, the Organization argues that no emergency existed,
and the Carrier failed to call the Senior available, Extra Board Employee.
Rule 51(e) states, in pertinent part, that:
"Carrier may defer or may distribute in whole or in part the work
of the absent employee. Employees assigned to perform the work of
the absent employee will be compensated in accordance with the
provisions of Rule 48."
Rule 48 provides that employees assigned to higher rated positions
work shall receive the higher rate of pay.
We conclude that Rule 65 cannot be invoked in a vacuum. Clearly,
Rule 51(e) contemplates the utilization of employees as presented by the facts of
this case. The Organization has not established a Rule violation.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds;
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as
approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
AWARD
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:
~11G'~
~ CV
E D
Nancy
~roel
r Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 30th day of September 1985.
L0 i ic
0~'
cago