NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Locket Number MW-25492
Eckehard Muessig, Referee
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The Chesapeake and Ohio Railroad Company (Southern Region)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The Carrier violated the Agreement when it assigned Shop Craft
employes instead of Bridge and Building Department forces to perform maintenance work along Pit 25 i
17, 1982 (System File C-TC-1425/MG-3671).
(2) Because of the aforesaid violation Bridge and Building Mechanics
C. R. Stratton,
W.
Smith, I. Wiley, G. Gosnay, H. Clay, D. L. Dean, C. Hanshaw,
S. Byrd and D. L. Farnsworth shall each be allowed an equal proportionate
share of the sixteen (16) man-hours consumed by Shop Craft employes in the
performance of the work referred to in Part (1) hereof."
OPINION OF BOARD: This Claim arose when the Carrier assigned Shop Craft
Laborers to perform repairs to concrete along Pit 25 in
the Wheel Bay at the Huntington Shops, Huntington, West Virginia.
The organization asserts that work of this character has traditionally and historically been
the Carrier's Bridge and Structures Forces. It relies upon its construction
of Rule 66-Classification and numerous past arbitral awards to support its
basic contentions that the Agreement had been breached.
The International Brotherhood of Firemen and oilers were notified
of this Claim as possible parties of interest, but that Organization determined not to intervene.
Although the Board notes that the parties do not agree on the precise
date on which the alleged breach of Agreement occurred, both agree that it
took place in August 1982. It is apparent that the work performed is not
under dispute. Given these circumstances, we do not find a defect in the
Claim that would serve to set it aside on that basis.
Turning to the merits, the Board concludes that the Organization
has met its burden of proof. The Carrier's basic response to the Claim
essentially rests on a contention that it had to utilize the most readily
available employee.because of an emergency situation. This contention is not
supported by the evidence of record.
Award Number 25817 Page 2
Locket Number MW-25492
Turning to the amount of damages claimed, the Board finds these to
be excessive, in view of the nature of the breach. We award two (2) hours
pay at the straight time rate in accordance with Part 2 of the Claim.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was violated.
A W A R D
Claim sustained in accordance with the opinion.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:
Nancy ver - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 12th day of December 1985.