NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number MW-25662
George S. Roukis, Referee
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company
(Southern Region)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The Carrier violated the Agreement when it assigned Shop Craft
painters instead of Bridge and Structures forces to paint nine (9) electrical
boxes, crane arms and the Armature Room in the Electrical Shop on October 7,
8, 9, 1 and 13, 1982 (System File C-TC-1470/MG-3800).
(2) Because of the aforesaid violation, B&B Mechanics W. W. Smith,
H. Clay, D. L. Dean, C. Hanshaw, K. Brown, D. Scarberry and C. Stratton shall
each be allowed an equal proportionate share of the thirty-six (36) man-hours
expended by Shop Craft painters in performing the work referred to in Part (1)
hereof."
OPINION OF BOARD: The Organization contends that on October 7, 8, 9, 12 and
13, 1982 Carrier required Shop Craft painters to perform
the work of painting nine (9) electrical boxes, overhead crane arms and the
Armature Room in the Electrical Shop located in the Huntington Shops. The
Organization avers that work of this character was customarily performed by
Carrier's Bridge and Structures forces and is contractually reserved to them
under the provisions of Rule 66(c) and Appendix H. The Organization asserts
that contrary to Carrier's denial that any such work was performed on the
claim dates, it (the Organization) presented photographs showing that the
walls and hand railings of the Armature Room were painted bright green and
bright yellow, respectively, and the electrical boxes were painted bright
orange.
Carrier contends that no painting work was performed in the Armature
Room during the claim period and denies that Shop Craft painters painted
electrical boxes in the repair gang area of the Huntington Shop. Instead, it
avers that on October 8, 1982, two (2) locomotive painters consumed one
man-hour painting the bottom of two hundred fifty ton crane hooks for safety
reasons which was permissible and within the recognized division of work at
the Electrical Shop. It maintains that the Organization has failed to present
evidence that the work was performed on the dates cited, and observes that
October 9, 1982 was a rest day at the Huntington Shops. In its Rebuttal
Submission, it took umbrage at the Organization's position that Appendix H was
applicable and protected such work, arguing that Appendix H was never
referenced or discussed on the property. It asserts that this is new material
and barred from the Board's consideration.
Award Number 25928 Page 2
Docket Number MW-25662
In our review of this case, we agree with Carrier's position. As
the moving party in the dispute, the organization was under a more compelling
burden to demonstrate that the work was performed on the cited dates. While
the photographs, at least on their face, were indeed persuasive, additional
factual substantiation was needed to overcome Carrier's affirmative defense.
Eyewitness written statements would have strengthened the Organization's
petition as well as unequivocal rebuttal evidence that October 9, 1982 was not
a rest day. In the absence of this proof, we are not in a clear firm position
to determine whether the Controlling Agreement was violated. As an aside, we
might note that the Organization belatedly raised in its Ex Parte Submission
the relevancy and application of Appendix H.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:
,'-Nancy J r - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 26th day of
February 1986
.
J,
I
v