NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT
BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-26404
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks,
(Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The Texas Mexican Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
(GL-10012) that:
1. Carrier violated Rule 27 of the Clerks' Agreement when it
dismissed Clerk M. A. Flores from its service for a period of thirty (30) days
as a result of investigation held October 9, 1984.
2. Carrier's action was unjust, arbitrary and an abuse of discretion.
3. Carrier shall now be required to expunge the investigation
transcript and all references thereto from Clerk Flores' personal record and
compensate him for any and all losses sustained."
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant was disciplined with a 30 day suspension for
driving a Company Truck into a guard rail, causing damage
to the truck requiring parts replacement and repairs.
Although Claimant admits his guilt, there was disputed testimony at
the investigative Hearing accorded him, over whether Claimant actually or
possibly encountered a steering mqchanism difficulty in the circumstances
leading to the accident. Also disputed was whether Notice of the Investigation charging Claimant was
whether the Hearing Officer validly could also function as Carrier's First
Officer in line of appeal.
We consider the charge precisely stated. Further, the Hearing
Officer took no adversarial position either way. He gave no testimony, and
functioned in official capacity free from any prejudicial act.
The record amply justifies the Hearing Officer's determination of
Claimant's guilt. But in this instance, the penalty is too severe.
We will award that Claimant's suspension be reduced to a 15 day
suspension, rather than 30 days' corrective discipline as assessed.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
Award Number 26014 Page 2
Docket Number CL-26404
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the discipline was excessive.
A W A R D
Claim sustained in accordance with the Opinion.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest
Nancy J. ever - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 28th day of May 1986.
F
\ce/
`\ /1icago (3~\
,,r