NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number SG-26110
George S. Roukis, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the General Committee of the Brotherhood of
Railroad Signalmen on the Elgin, Joliet and Eastern
Railway Company:
Claim on behalf of Sheridan Vale for 2 hours' pay at the punitive
rate of pay account of being required to work overtime at Crossover Switch No.
74 at Stockton No. 2, on July 28, 1983 and not being paid in accordance with
Rule 14. Carrier file RS-2-83."
OPINION OF BOARD: The Organization contends that Carrier violated Rule 14 of
the Controlling Agreement, when it (Carrier) failed to
compensate properly Claimant for two hours pay at his punitive rate of pay
when he was assigned regular or ordinary service outside of his regular
assigned hours on July 28, 1983. It asserts that Rule 14 requires that
monthly rated employes assigned to perform regular or outside service outside
of regular assigned hours be paid at the overtime rate provided in the
Agreement. The Organization maintains that an emergency was not present as
contended by Carrier when Claimant repaired the No. 74 crossover switch and
accordingly, argues that he is entitled to the overtime payment requested. It
observes that an emergency as defined in Rule 42 of the Agreement includes
such contingencies as a flood, snowstorm, hurricane, tornado, earthquake, fire
or labor dispute. Rule 14 reads:
"RATES OF PAY OF FOREMEN AND OTHER MONTHLY RATED
EMPLOYES
The monthly rate of monthly rated employes
covers all service performed during the calendar
month except as provided herein. All monthly
rates of pay are based on 213 hours per month. A
monthly rated employe shall be assigned one
regular rest day each week, Sunday if possible,
and when required to perform service on such
rest day will be allowed extra compensation at
the overtime rate. The straight time hourly
rates for monthly rated employes shall be
determined by dividing the monthly rate by 213.
Overtime rate for monthly rated employes shall
be determined by multiplying the straight time
hourly rate by 1 1/2. Monthly rated employes
assigned by the management to perform regular or
ordinary service outside of regularly assigned
hours will be compensated at the overtime rate
provided herein for such service."
Award Number 26026 Page 2
Docket Number SG-26110
Carrier does not deny the basic interpretation that monthly rated
employes assigned to perform regular or ordinary service outside of regularly
assigned hours are entitled to overtime compensation, but argues that a
recognizable exception was present, namely an emergency which precludes the
application of the overtime requirement. It asserts that the loss of a
centralized traffic control power switch created an emergency situation that
necessitated, by definition, prompt and effective corrective action. It avers
that due to the heat that day, the rail displaced to such an extent that the
mechanism of the power switch made the crossover switch inoperable. It notes
that the density of road and yard traffic as measured by ton miles, ranks the
highest on the property and thus, any unpredictable, sudden cessation of
traffic would have to be considered an emergency. In effect, it contends that
since excessive heat (weather) caused the running rail and switch points to be
displaced and since no amount of preventive maintenance could have prevented
this outcome, it would be illogical to conclude that an emergency was not
present.
In our review of this case, we concur with Carrier's position. In
a predecessor Award dealing with an essentially similar issue and involving
the same parties, we found that the repair of a gate arm at a public highway
crossing constituted emergency duty and we denied the claim for overtime.
(See Third Division Award No. 25851.) Based on the record herein and
consistent with our determination in Third Division Award No. 25851, we find
that an emergency existed at No. 74 crossover at Stockton, Indiana on July 28,
1983. We find no distinction that would warrant a variant interpretation or a
finding that said work was clearly of a regular or ordinary nature and, as
such, we are compelled to deny thg claim.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
Award Number 26026 Page 3
Docket Number SG-26110
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:
Nancy T~6er - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois this 28th day of May 1986.