(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes PARTIES TO DISPUTE:



STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:

(1) The Carrier violated the Agreement when it improperly closed the service record of Mr. E. Cohen (System File NEC-BMWE-SD-684).

(2) Mr. E. Cohen shall be returned to service with seniority and all other rights unimpaired and he shall be compensated for all wage loss suffered."

OPINION OF BOARD: On July 8, 1983, the Claimant was notified by the Carrier
that he was considered as having resigned and was therefore
removed from the Seniority Roster as per Rule 21-A of the Agreement. The Rule
is self-executing when an employe is absent fourteen consecutive days without
notifying the Supervisor, unless there is documented evidence of either
physical incapacity or circumstances beyond control preventing such notifi
cation.

The Organization contends that Claimant worked two of the days that the Carrier included in the absence count, and that the Rule was inapplicable because he was not absent at all because he had been released from his Gang. Furthermore, the Claimant produced a medical note after July 8, 1983, stating he could return to work on July 15, 1983.

The Carrier observes that the Claimant was absent more than fourteen days even if the two days in question were not counted, and that the doctor's note was produced after the fact and did not speak to any incapacity to notify the Supervisor within the proper time period. Also, Claimant was not released from his Gang nor was this assertion made on the property.

The Board concludes, based upon the narrow facts of the instant case, that Claimant shall be restored to service with his former seniority and all rights unimpaired, but without compensation for wage loss suffered. We deny his Claim for lost wages.





That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934;

                        Docket Number MW-26163


That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and

        That the Agreement was violated.


                        A W A R D


        Claim sustained in accordance with the Opinion.


                            NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                            By Order of Third Division


Attest:
        Nancy J,R6er - Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this llth day of June 1986.