NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-26043
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline 6 Steamship Clerks,
(Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Chicago and North Western Transportation Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
(GL-9936) that:
1. Carrier violated the Agreement Rules, particularly Rule 21, when
under date of August 2, 1983, it dismissed Mr. Charles Everett from the
service of the Carrier on the basis of a formal hearing which was held on July
18, 1983, and concluded on July 26, 1983, and
2. Carrier shall be required to return Claimant, Mr. Charles Everett
to the service of the Carrier with all rights unimpaired and payment for all
time lost account of his dismissal."
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant was employed by the Carrier as an Order Filler at
the Material Distribution Center at Proviso Yard. Claimant
was absent from duty on June 27, 1983. On June 28th, Claimant informed his
Supervisor that he had been absent because of his arrest for unpaid traffic
tickets. Claimant was told that he must submit documentation of this before
he could return to work. Claimant returned to work on June 30th and submitted
documentation of his incarceration. On July 1, 1983, Claimant was notified to
attend a formal Investigation of the following charges:
"I) Your responsibility for your failure to
protect your assignment; specifically, your failure
to properly absent yourself from work on Monday,
June 27, 1983.
2) Your responsibility for submitting false
documentation in connection with your failure to
properly absent yourself from work on Monday, June
27, 1983".
As a result of the Investigation, Claimant was dismissed from service, effective August 2, 1983.
behalf, challenging his dismissal.
Award Number 26064 Page 2
Docket Number CL-26043
This Board has reviewed the evidence and testimony in this case, and
it finds that the Claimant was granted all of his procedural rights at the
Hearing; and, therefore, we hereby reject all of the procedural arguments
raised by the Organization.
With respect to the substantive issue, this Board finds that there is
sufficient evidence in the record to support the finding that the Claimant was
guilty of failing to protect his assignment on June 27, 1983, and for later
submitting false documentation in an effort to support his excuse. At the
Hearing, the Claimant acknowledged that he was absent on the date in question,
and he did not call to advise the Carrier that he would not be at work.
Moreover, there is substantial evidence in the record to show that the
Claimant had not been arrested as he stated and that the information that was
contained in the record that he submitted to the Carrier had been falsified.
Once this Board has determined that there is sufficient evidence in
the record to support the Carrier's finding of guilty, we next turn our attention to the type of dis
long record of absenteeism and tardiness and had previously been suspended for
thirty days for absenteeism less than three months prior to the incident in
question. Moreover, the Claimant had been dismissed from service previously
and later reinstated. The Claimant has been given sufficient opportunity to
improve his attendance record and failed to make any improvement. Consequently, this Board finds tha
will not set it aside.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
Award Number 26064 Page 3
Docket Number CL-26043
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:
Nancy . Dever - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 8th day of July 1986.
0