NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number MW-26252
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Burlington Northern Railroad Company
(St. Louis-San Francisco)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The dismissal of Trackman R. M. Edmonds for alleged 'unsatisfactory work and violation of Ad
just and sufficient cause and on the basis of unproven charges (System File
B-1950-2/MWC 84-1-30).
(2) The claimant shall be reinstated with seniority and all other
rights unimpaired, the charges leveled against him shall be cleared from his
record and he shall be compensated for all wage loss suffered."
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant while on the job with Tie Gang T-2-11 was dis
missed for his unsatisfactory work. The dismissal was
sustained following an Investigative Hearing held by Carrier on August 12,
1983.
There was substantial evidence to support Carrier's conclusion warranting discipline. Claimant h
period of employment, and has received oral and written counselling on aspects
of his employment habits including unsatisfactory work. However, dismissal is
too severe. The time that Claimant has been out of service should constitute
sufficient discipline.
The procedural arguments raised are found to be without merit.
We will award that Claimant be reinstated with seniority and other
rights unimpaired, but without back pay. This Award carries with it the
strict understanding that Claimant is being given one last chance to become an
effectively performing employe and that further major instances of poor work
habits cannot be expected to occur without serious consequences.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
Award Number 26079 Page 2
Docket Number MW-26252
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the discipline was excessive.
A W A R D
Claim sustained in accordance with Opinion.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:
Nancy J. -Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois this 31st day of July 1986.