(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks, ( Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes PARTIES TO DISPUTE: (Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis



1. Carrier violated the Clerks' Agreement when it issued thirty (30) days actual suspension to Claimant, which was arbitrary, excessive and an abuse of discretion on September 14, 1984, following investigation held on Friday, August 31, 1984.

2. Carrier's action is in violation of Rules 23, 24, and 33 (b) of the Agreement and letter of Carrier's Superintendent B. 0. Matthews dated March 13, 1984, to Division Chairman of the Organization.

3. Carrier shall now be required to compensate Claimant Oestreich for the thirty (30) days time lost for period September 15 to October 15, 1984, with seniority, vacation and all other rights unimpaired."

OPINION OF BOARD: On August 12, 1984, Claimant, working as a Crew Clerk,
permitted an employe under her jurisdiction to lay off for
one day. This was done despite the written instructions given to Claimant on
August 7, 1984 by her superior that "There will be no more lay offs or addi
tional vacations allowed ...Friday 8/10 - Sat 8/11 - Sun 8/12." Because she
could not produce a legitimate reason for the error, and because this was the
second time such an error was committed, a thirty-day suspension was imposed.

The Organization contends that the punishment was in violation of a Letter of Agreement which provided that a second error within six months of the first be handled as follows: "Conference with employe and their representative, documented with a letter."

The Board agrees that the suspension of Claimant was in violation of the clear language of the Letter of Agreement. She should be made whole. However, since the document should now be done.




Award Number 26119
Docket Number CL-26287

Page 2

That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and





        Claim sustained in accordance with the Opinion.


                            NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                            By Order of Third Division


Attest:
        Nancy J. a

              JoAt -Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 19th day of September 1986.