NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-26045
Robert W. McAllister, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks,
( Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Missouri Pacific Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
(GL-9956) that:
1. Carrier violated the Clerks' Rules Agreement which became
effective March 1, 1973, and in particular Rule 7 as amended effective
September 1, 1982, when it required Clerk A. L. Saenz to train on CSC Clerk
No. 124 and failed and refused to compensate him accordingly.
2. Carrier shall now be required to compensate Clerk A. L. Saenz
five (5) days pay at the rate of CSC Position No. 124."
OPINION OF BOARD: The Claimant, with seniority from September 24, 1968, had
his position abolished effective the end of his tour on
November 12, 1982. On November 12, the Claimant indicated he wished to
exercise his seniority and displace a Junior Clerk. The Carrier verbally
approved his request and confirmed that approval in writing on November 12,
1982, as follows:
"This is to confirm verbal advice given you
that your request to displace junior employee
on CSC Job #I124 is approved subject to you
becoming qualified on same; however, you are
not being instructed to break in on this
position as contemplated in Training Agreement of August 19, 1982."
The Organization notes that although the Carrier approved the
Claimant's displacement on Customer Service Position No. 124, it failed to
comply with Rule 7(b) and required the Claimant to train five (5) days without
pay.
The Carrier denies any Agreement violation and argues that break-in
pay is applicable only to employes who have been instructed by the Carrier to
qualify on certain work and/or positions. The Carrier believes the Organization herein is asking the
he is already qualified and, after shopping for a different job, require the
Carrier to pay break-in pay. The Carrier contends the Claimant's actions were
voluntary in that he chose not to retain his regular assignment; he failed to
exercise seniority to other positions of a higher rate which required no preliminary training; and h
immediately qualified. The controlling language was added to Rule 7 effective
September 1, 1982, and reads in pertinent part:
Award Number 26126 Page 2
Docket Number CL-26045
"TRAINING
Except as otherwise provided in paragraph
(b) of Rule 35, Carrier will provide pay
for training to qualifying employes as set
forth below beginning September 1, 1982.
Employes who have performed 90 or more
days of service under this Agreement, who
are instructed by Carrier to qualify on
certain work and/or positions, will be
compensated at one-half the rate of such
work or positions or the employe's protected rate, whichever is higher, for such
qualifying period that is deemed necessary
by Carrier. The provisions of this rule
do not apply to voluntary exercise of
seniority (except as provided in examples
attached hereto); to trainees who have not
established seniority under this Agreement; to employes returning from leaves of
absence under Rules 11, 12 or 17; to
employes returning from other service,
such as dispatcher or yardmaster; or to
employes reinstated to service after
disciplinary absence."
The Carrier stresses the above quoted phrase "who are instructed by
Carrier." Singularly, the following Attachment to Rule 7 states:
"PAY FOR TRAINING
Pay for training is intended to apply in instances where
Carrier causes the move, and not to events resulting from
individual employe actions.
Examples: When Carrier instructs employe to train
under following circumstances:
Provide Pay for Training Do Not Provide Pay for
When: Training when:
(1) Employes assigned to (1) Employe returns from leaves
Extra Board are instruct- of absence, such as:
ed to train.
Award Number
Docket Number
(2) Displacement results from
Carrier's abolishment
of job.
(3) Carrier changes duties of
a new job.
(4) Carrier installs new equipment, systems, practices,
etc.
(5) Employe returns from
military service.
(6) Carrier changes job from
day to night or vice versa
or 8 hours or more.
Employe is permitted to
move up to a vacancy of
equal or higher rate for
which he has sufficient
fitness and ability (as
contemplated in Rule 4)
to qualify for with 5 or
less days' training.
26126
CL-26045
Sick leave
Personal leave, or return
from service as:
Dispatcher
Yardmaster
Official, Excepted or
Restricted Position
(2) Employe voluntarily leaves
a position because of
change in assigned hours.
(3) Employe voluntarily change:
jobs (except as provided
Item 7 in left column).
(4) Absence because of disci
pline."
Page 3
in
This Board finds little merit in the argument the Claimant somehow
voluntarily chose not to retain his regular assignment. The record discloses
the CSC Clerk No. 125 position was abolished to change the rest days. The
examples set forth in the clarifying Attachment clearly indicates training pay
will be provided when displacement results from Carrier's abolishment of a
job. The reliance upon the phrase "who are instructed by Carrier" is, in our
view, reliance upon language taken out of context and not read in conjunction
with the whole of the September 1, 1982, Amendments to Rule 7. Simply put,
the withholding of any instruction to train would enable the Carrier to
nullify those specific instances the Attachment clearly and unambiguously
provides
"...
Pay for Training When." Claimant is to be paid 5 days Training
Pay at the rate established by amended Rule 7.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was violated.
Award Number 26126 Page 4
Docket Number CL-26045
A W A R D
Claim sustained in accordance with the Opinion.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:
Nancy J. /Do -Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 19th day of September 1986.