NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number MS-26075
PARTIES 7n DISPUTE:
(Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
"On April
4, 1983
a six or seven month pay resignation offer was post-
ed on the bulletin boards of the Chicago Accounting Department. This offer
was directed to all Protected Employee Clerks, both Merger and April
1, 1981,
during a time when there was an excess of Protected Employee Clerks on the
Account-Department Roster. This offer is a flagrant violation of Section 10
of the Illinois Central Gulf's Merger Agreement. Under Section 10 a sepera
tion (sic) allowance of 12 months pay must be given to those 65 and under who
request it, in seniority number order, if an excess of protected employees
occurs. On April 6,
1983
I requested a 12 month seperation (sic) allowance
under Section 10 of the Merger Agreement, stating that the offer of April
4,
1983
which ran through April 15,
1983
was in violation of the Merger
Agreement. My requests sere denied by the Illinois Central Gulf, thus causing
me to file a claim through the Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship
Clerks Union. The General Chairman W. C. Woods, of the BRAC local wrote
August
1, 1984,
informing me of my grievances denial by the highest Carrier
Officer. Therefor (sic) I am respectfully requesting 12 months salary which
is what I was denied by the ICG's erroneous resignation offer of April
4, 1983.
OPINION OF BOARD: The basic facts are clear. The Claimant in this case was a
Clerk in Chicago, Illinois. From April
4, 1983,
through
April 15,
1983,
the Company offered all protected Clerks six (6) or seven (7)
months' severance pay, depending on whether the payment was lump sum or amor
tized, in exchange for that Clerk's resignation. The Claimant requested sever
ance pay but instead contended he was entitled to 12 months' severance pay
pursuant to Section 10 of the Merger Protection Agreement, which states in
pertinent part as follows:
"Section 10 - Separation Allowance
(a) Inasmuch as the New Company may have an excess
number of 'Protected Employees' in any given zone
as established by this Agreement, the New Company
may provide for the payment of allowances to 'Pro
tected Employees' who shall resign from the service
so as to create whatever vacancies may be needed to
effectively utilize the services of the force of
'Protected Employees.' If the New Company exer
cises the option provided in this Section, it shall
offer the opportunity to resign and accept a sep
aration allowance to 'Protected Employees' in sen
iority order in the hone zone involved in lieu of
all other protection and benefits provided under
this Agreement.
Award Number 26206 Page 2
Locket Number MS-26075
(b) The amount of the separation allowances shall
be based upon the age of the 'Protected Employee'
as of his nearest birthday on the date such allowance is offered. The amount of such allowance
shall be:
ALLOWANCE
Age 65 and under 12 Months' pay
Age 66 10 Months' pay
Age 67 8 Months' pay
Age 68 6 Months' pay
Age 69 and over 4 Months' pay
at the rate of the position last occupied or protected rate, whichever is higher."
The Company denied his request and after appeal the matter is before this
Hoard.
In reviewing the record, it is the conclusion of the Board that regardless of the disputed meani
"claim" before the Board over which we can properly assert jurisdiction. This
is because the Claimant on November 1, 1984, signed the following "resignation
and release."
"I, Norman Ray Stevens, hereby resign from the service of the Illinois Central Gulf Railr
discharge said Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Canpany from any and all claims, demands, grievances
and causes of action of any nature, kind, character, or description, either at common law or
under any State or Federal statute.
It is understood that the consideration for this
Resignation and Release, is the payment to me by
the Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Company the sum
of $13,582.08, less state and federal taxes.
I further represent that before signing this Resignation and Release, I have fully informed myse
its contents.
This Resignation and Release signed this 1st day of
November, 1984."
Award Number 26206 Page 3
Locket Number MS-26075
It has long been held that in view of such agreements, the matter is considered settled for the
Third Division Awards 19527, 19528 and 19530:
"This Hoard has consistently recognized that an
employee is bound by such a settlement and release,
and that in the face of such a settlement and release the disputes caning thereunder are deemed to
be adjusted and this Hoard has no jurisdiction. It
is not necessary for the Hoard to deal with the
substantive issue raised in these dockets as the
issue has been made moot."
Also see Awards 20832 and 20247.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Claim is moot.
A WAR D
Claim dismissed.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By order of Third Division
Attest: i
Nancy J. ~Ver - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 12th day of December 1986.