(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes PARTIES TO DISPUTE: (The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company ( qouthern Region)



1. The Carrier violated the Agreement when it recalled furloughed Trackmen J. Allen, D. L. Sams, D. T. Forbes and R. M. Drewry, Jr. to permanent positions on Southern Region Rail Force 1201 effective March 5, 1984 and then furloughed them effective March 16, 1984 (System File C-TC-2263/MG-4571).

2. As a consequence of the aforesaid violation, Trackmen J. Allen, D. L. Sams, D. T. Forbes and R. M. Drewry, Jr. shall be compensated for all regular and overtime wage loss suffered beginning March through April 3, 1984."

OPINION OF BOARD: On "arch 5, 1984, Claimants were recalled as Laborers on
the Carrier's Southern Region Rail Gang, Force 1201. Nine
(9) days later the Claimants were furloughed. On April 3, 1984, the Organi
zation filed a Claim on behalf of the Claimants on the grounds that they
should have been allowed to work thirty (30) days unless displaced. The Claim
is for hours not worked between March 16, 1984, the effective date of the
Claimants' furlough, and April 3, 1984.

At bar is the correct Interpretation of current Agreements Rule 5(c). This Rule reads, in pertinent part, as follows:



                      Docket Number MW-26377


          arises, any man available may be used until the senior man is available. For laborer positions o must respond for thirty days' work or more or forfeit seniority similar to the provisions of Rule 2(i)."


Study of this Rule does not persuade the Board that it places a requirement on the Carrier to wo upon recall although the Rule does say that Laborers are required to return to service when there are thirty (30) days of work or more available, or forfeit seniority. Numerous Awards issued by the Board have precedentially established that the Board has no authority to add to nor substract from Agreements.

The Board is charged with the Interpretation of Agreements as written (Third Division 20276, 20755, 21182). Such precedent reasonably applies to the instant case and the Claim cannot be sustained.

        FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:


        That the parties waived oral hearing;


That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and

        That the Agreement was not violated.


                        A W A R D


        Claim denied.


                              NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                              By Order of Third Division


Attest. ,
        Nancy ver - Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois this 20th day of March 1987.