(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes PARTIES TO DISPUTE: (Consolidated Rail Corporation



(1) The discipline (written reprimand) imposed upon Welder J. L. Mitchell for alleged 'Failure to comply with safety rule #3020 (A) and #3039 at Canton, M. W. Shop, Canton, Ohio at approximately 8:15 A.M. on September 21, 1983, which resulted in a personal injury' was unreasonable, unwarranted and on the basis of unproven charges (System Docket CR-776-D).

(2) The claimant's record shall be cleared of the charges leveled against him and the written reprimand shall be removed from his record."

OPINION OF BOARD: The Claimant was charged with failure to comply with Safety
Rule Nos. 3020(A) and 3039 at the Carrier's Canton Maintenance of Way Shop at approximately 8:15 on this matter was held on December 28, 1983, the Claimant was advised that a Letter of Reprimand was being made part of his personal file. The Rules at bar read, in pertinent part, as follows.









The record shows that the Claimant was working as a Welder at the Canton Shop. After he was given an order to do some welding on Machine BR1181, which is a brush cutter, he attempted to secure an Overhead Crane to move his welding equipment and tanks close to the machine. Since the cranes were all being used the Claimant was ordered to move his welding equipment by hand to the work site. While doing so he was injured when he cut his shoulder on an exposed sharp burr on a moun


It is the position of the Carrier that the Claimant was injured because he was not wearing prope evidence of record to warrant the conclusion that the Claimant should have been wearing his welding jacket when the injury occurred, nor that the injury would not have occurred if he would have been wearing the jacket. The record also establishes that there were many obstacles in the shop around which the Claimant had to negotiate his welding equipment in order to get it close to the Brush Cutter which created a potential Safety Hazard. Lastly, the Board can find no substantial evidence showing of negligence on the part of the Claimant while he was moving the welding equipment.

As moving partv it is encumbent upon the Carrier to bear the burden of proof that the Claimant was in violation of the Rules at bar (Third Division Awards 5881, 6056, 1 right to enforce its Safety Rules, the Board cannot find violation of them in the record presented to it. The Claim must be sustained.

        FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:


        That the parties waived oral hearing;


That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Fmployes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1034;

That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and

        That the Agreement was violated.


                        A W A R D


        Claim sustained.


                              NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                              By Order of Third Division


Attes
        Nancy er - Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, i11fnois this 20th day of March 1987.