NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number MW-26281
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company
(Northern Region)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The Carrier violated the Agreement when, without thirty (30)
calendar days' advance written notice to the General Chairman and without a
conference with the General Chairman as required by Rule 8-1/2(a), it
abolished the Bay City, Lansing and Benton Harbor Section Gangs effective
December 1, 1983 (System File C-M-1699/MG-4444).
(2) Because of the aforesaid violation, Mr. M. Bowen shall be
allowed two (2) days' pay at his straight time rate; Mr. J. Taylor shall be
allowed four (4) days' pay at his straight time rate; Mr. M. Dean shall be
allowed one (1) day's pay at his straight time rate; Messrs. R. Brooks, G.
Dryer, D. Dryer, J. Moyer, T. Szweda, J. Shepherd and M. Schlutt shall each be
allowed twenty-two (22) days of pay at their respective straight time rates
and Mr. J. Birch shall be allowed twenty-one (21) days of pay at his straight
time rate."
OPINION OF BOARD: On November 18, 1983, the Assistant Chairman wrote the
Manager-Engineering a Claim on behalf of any employes who
would be effected by a December 1, 1983 abolishment of forces in violation of
Rule 8 1/2 (a). He noted that he had "been advised by men working at Bay
City, Lansing and Benton Harbor" that there would be a December first force
reduction.
The Carrier denied the above Claim on both procedural and substantive grounds. With respect to p
that:
...we find your claim submitted in advance of
planned force reductions improper inasmuch as
you were unable to provide any specific information with respect to employees involved, dates
and places of subsequent displacements and time
allegedly lost."
The Carrier later emphasized again that it declined the Claim since it was
"presented to Manager-Engineering Rymer prior to the force reductions
involved
...."
On merits, it denied the applicability of Rule 8 1/2 (a) and
argued its abolishments were proper under Rule 8 1/2 (b).
This Board has carefully reviewed the procedural issue involved.
Rule 24 (Discipline and Grievances), (h)(1)(A) states in pertinent part that:
Award Number 26326 Page 2
Docket Number MW-26281
"All claims or grievances must be presented
in writing by or on behalf of the employee
involved, to the officer of the Carrier authorized to receive same, within sixty (60) days
from the date of the occurrence on which the
claim or grievance is based." (Emphasis added)
The Claim at bar was not presented "within sixty (60) days from the date of
the occurrence," but in advance of the predicted occurrence. The language of
the negotiated Agreement does not support such action and is specifically
written to stipulate a claim on "behalf of the employee involved." The
instant Claim was a "blanket time claim on behalf of any and all employes
adversely effected by the series of displacements that will take place
...."
Nowhere in the handling on property did the Organization take issue or deny
the procedural objection of the Carrier.
This Board finds that the "Claim" was premature and failed to follow
the grievance procedures as negotiated. As such, the Claim is barred and this
Board cannot reach the merits of the case. This ruling is consistent with the
logic of Second Division Award 9685 which pertained to the same issue with
different circumstances and contract language. As that Award stated "we
cannot
...
go beyond what the parties themselves have bargained and sanction a
right to grieve over events which have not yet taken place."
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Claim is barred.
A W A R D
Claim dismissed.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:
4;z4e~
eo
Nancy J. - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 13th day of May 1987.