NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number SG-26258
Robert W. McAllister, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Burlington Northern Railroad Company '
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the General Committee of the Brotherhood of
Railroad Signalmen on the Burlington Northern Railroad
Company:
Claim in behalf of Mr. C. Carter, former Webster Groves Signal
Maintainer, that he be reinstated to his former position, compensated for all
lost wages (including: lost time, overtime he would have been entitled to,
holiday pay, and any pay differential), reinstate all seniority rights,
reinstate all employment rights and benefits, and remove any reference of this
incident from his personal record, account of Carrier violated the current
agreement, particularly Rule 54G. Carrier file SI-83-12-22. General Chairman
File C-83-323.
OPINION OF BOARD: The Claimant was a Signal Maintainer headquartered at
Webster Groves, Missouri. By letter of March 23, 1983, the
Claimant was notified he was to attend a formal Investigation relating to a
violation of the Hours-of-Service Act. The Investigation was held on April
13, 1983. The Hearing Officer determined the Claimant had failed to comply
with instructions of both the Hours-of-Service Act and instructions issued by
the Engineering Department. As a result, he was restricted to work under the
direct supervision of a Signal Foreman.
The Organization argues the Claimant was not afforded a fair and
impartial Investigation. It also argues the record does not support the
Carrier's discipline and, furthermore, the discipline is excessive.
Before we can address these issues, the Carrier's Answer to the
Organization's Submission contends that on March 11, 1985, the Claimant
executed a release of all Claims in consideration of a $140,000 payment. This
was purportedly brought to the General Chairman's attention by letter dated
July 2, 1985. On August 27, 1985, the Organization, apparently, notified the
Carrier it was unable to withdraw this Claim because it was not part of the
Claimant's settlem2nt.
The release signed by the Claimant states in pertinent part:
Award Number 26345 Page 2
Docket Number SG-26258
...
I release and forever discharge Burlington
Northern Railroad Company and all other parties
whomsoever, from all claims and liabilities of
every kind or nature, including claims for injuries, if any, which are unknown to me at the
present time, arising out of an accident on or
about August 26, 1983, at or near St. Louis,
Missouri, while I was employed as a signalman
and in further consideration of this settlement,
I hereby resign from service of said company and
release said company from all claims in connection with seniority or employment rights (Pending EEOC
The Carrier argues this negotiated settlement and release renders
the dispute moot and, accordingly, asserts the Board lacks jurisdiction over
the Claim as presented.
The language of the release is broad. If there were any question
concerning the Claimant's interest to release the Carrier from any and all
claims, the specific exclusion of a pending EEOC claim satisfies this Board
that the Claimant voluntarily absolved the Carrier from all claims and did not
restrict the release to such claims as arose from the alleged injury on August
26, 1983. This Board has no alternative but to conclude this specific release
materially impacts upon our jurisdiction. See Third Division Awards 20832,
22645, 24869 and 25678. We subscribe to the view that if the language of the
release supports a finding the release encompasses all claims, the employe is
bound by the settlement and release. Accordingly, the Claim before us is moot
and barred from our consideration.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Claim is barred.
Award Number 26345 Page 3
Docket Number SG-26258
A W A R D
Claim dismissed.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:
Nancy J r - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 8th day of June 1987.