NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number MW-26430
Edward L. Suntrup, Referee
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Consolidated Rail Corporation
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The thirty (30) days of suspension imposed upon Machine
Operator F. Adams for alleged violation of Conrail's Safety Rules 3302D and
3273 on December 3, 1983 was without just and sufficient cause and on the
basis of unproven charges (System Docket CR-661-D).
(2) The claimant's record shall be cleared of the charges leveled
against him and he shall be compensated for all wage loss suffered."
OPINION OF BOARD: The Claimant was advised on December 21, 1983, to attend
an Investigation to determine facts and place responsi
bility, if any, in connection with the following:
"Damage to Track Car X1074 and Tamper ME4051 due
to collision which occurred approximately 375
feet North of Porter switch on the Delmarva
Secondary within yard limits at 9:15 AM on
December 3, 1983, as a result of your failure to
properly control the movement of Tamper ME4051
while following Track Car X1074, in violation of
Rule 3302D, Conrail's Safety Rules for Maintenance of Way Employees.
Violation of Rule 3273, Conrail's Safety Rules
for Maintenance of Way Employees, Form S7-C,
thereby causing damage to a tamping head on
Tamper ME4051 when it struck the switch stand on
the Deemer Steel Switch, MP 6.7, on December 3,
1983, due to your failure to have the head properly secured while traveling."
After the Investigktion was held on January 5, 1984, the Claimant was advised
that he had been found guilty of violating the Rules at bar and he was
assessed a thirty (30) day actual suspension. The Rules in question read, in
pertinent part, as follows:
Award Number 26354 Page 2
Docket Number MW-26430
Rule 3302(d):
"When operating self-propelled equipment:
(d) Reduce speed and give warning if person
or animal is close to equipment or
machine, or is near track, and stop
before hitting person, animal or obstruction.
Rule 3273:
"Movable work parts of hoisting equipment or
of self-propelled or other equipment must be
secured in 'UP' or otherwise 'CLEAR' position as
soon as work is stopped and before travelling."
At the time of the alleged incidents the Claimant was a Machine
Operator assigned to operate Carrier's Tamping Machine No. ME4051. According
to testimony given at the Investigation by Carrier's witnesses Track Inspector
F. Hood was operating Track Car No. X1074 North on the Carrier's Delmarva
Secondary track on the morning of December 3, 1983, and he was being followed
by the Claimant who was operating Tamper ME4051 cited above. At a point some
375 feet North of the Porter Station Switch the Track Inspector stopped his
Unit short of a highway grade crossing. According to testimony by this Inspector the Claimant was so
stop. Despite attempts by the Inspector to signal the Claimant to stop to
avoid a collision, Unit ME4051 operated by the Claimant nevertheless collided
with Unit X1074. As a result the latter was derailed and damaged and Unit
ME4051 was also damaged. The Equipment Supervisor who inspected Unit ME4051
after the collision testified at the Investigation that he could find no
problem with the brakes on this piece of equipment despite the Claimant's
testimony that the brakes had failed. There is sufficient corroborating
evidence of probative value in the record to warrant the conclusion that the
Claimant was, therefore, negligent and that he was in violation of Rule
3302(d). The record also shows that as a result of the damage sustained by
Unit ME4051 the Tamper head fell off the frame later when it was being operated by the Claimant afte
would not have happened if the head on the Tamper had been properly secured in
accordance with the requirements of Rule 3273.
On the basis of the record taken as a whole there is sufficient
evidence of probative value to warrant the conclusion that the Claimant was
guilty as charged on both counts. The Claim cannot be sustained.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
Award Number 26354 Page 3
Docket Number MW-26430
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:
Nancy J. e - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 8th day of June 1987.