NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number MW-26539
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK)
(Northeast Corridor)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
1. The thirty (30) days of suspension imposed upon Trackman R. F.
MacKenzie for alleged 'Violation of Rule "L"' (assuming the attitude of sleep)
on November 2, 1983, was without just and sufficient cause (System File NECBMWE-SD-825D).
2. The claimant's record shall be cleared of the charges leveled
against him and he shall be compensated for all wage loss suffered."
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant was withheld from service on November 2, 1983, for
sleeping in a Carrier motor vehicle on that date. The
record demonstrates that Claimant and two other employees were observed sleep
ing while on duty by two Carrier Supervisors. After Hearing on January 10,
1984, and by letter dated January 24, 1984, Claimant was assessed a 30 day
suspension.
The Organization's argument that the Carrier improperly withheld
Claimant from service under Rule 69 since sleeping is not a major offense
under that Rule cannot be considered by this Board since it was not properly
raised on the property.
We reject the Organization's argument that Claimant was improperly
notified of his withholding from service by the Track Supervisor rather than
the Division Engineer where Rule 69 requires the "department head" to make
notification of such action. In similar situations, the same argument
advanced by the Organization has been made and not sustained. See Public Law
Board No. 2406, Award No. 47.
With respect to the merits of the Claim, we find substantial evidence
in the record to support the Carrier's determination that discipline should be
imposed. Two Carrier witnesses testified that they observed Claimant sitting
in the vehicle with his eyes closed for between 60 and 90 seconds. Such is
sufficient to establish that Claimant was in violation of Rule L which prohibits sleeping. Sleeping
discipline including discharge. See Third Division Award 24365; Second
Division Awards 10498, 9260, 8886, 8712, 8537. Standing alone, the fact that
credibility conflicts existed in the record does not cause this Board to
resolve credibility different from that made during the Investigation. Second
Division Awards 10498, 8712, supra. Nothing has been shown in this record
that can cause us to make a contrary credibility determination. Finally, no
showing has been made that a 30 day suspension was arbitrary or capricious.
Award Number 26389 Page 2
Docket Number MW-26539
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest
Nancy J. Dever - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 13th day of July 1987.