NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-26768
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks,
(Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
(GL-10040) that:
(a) Carrier violated the rules of the current Clerks' Agreement at
Richmond, California, when it removed Mr. A. P. Esqueda from service on April
27, 1984, as a result of a formal investigation held on April 11, 1984, and
(b) Mr. A. P. Esqueda shall now be returned to Carrier service and
paid for all loss of wages and benefits commencing on or about April 27, 1984."
OPINION OF BOARD: As a result of the Carrier's March 26, 1984, audit,
Claimant was charged with having deliberately falsified
Unemployment Compensation Claims for January 5, 10, 26 and February 20, 1984.
After the Hearing on April 11, 1984, the Claimant was dismissed from service.
Claimant testified that he did not complete the records necessary for
making the Unemployment Claims, but that one of several clerks employed by the
Carrier performed that task. However, Claimant testified that the clerk
merely recorded his responses to questions. Claimant signed the forms certifying that the informatio
giving information concerning the Unemployment Claim Forms to the clerks, he
does not always have the accurate information concerning when he actually
worked, but gives information based upon his best knowledge.
For the same reasons set forth in Third Division Award 26395, we
reject the organization's argument that the Investigation was untimely within
the meaning of Rule 24-A. The Investigation was held within 20 days of the
Carrier's discovery through its audit performed on March 26, 1984, that discrepancies existed on the
Investigation was timely held.
Similarly, as in Third Division Award 26395, we do not find that
substantial evidence exists in this record to support the Carrier's
determination that Claimant engaged in a "deliberate" falsification of his
Unemployment Claims at the time those Claims were filed. At most, the
Award Number 26396 Page 2
Docket Number CL-26768
record shows that Claimant was quite careless in providing the information
concerning his actual dates of work or receipt of holiday pay. The fact that
a clerk filled out the Unemployment Claim Form does not excuse Claimant's conduct since the clerk wa
Claimant thereafter was given the opportunity to review, correct and sign the
Claim form.
As in Third Division Award 26395, Claimant took no timely action to
correct his mistakes when he realized or should have realized that he was
receiving double payments. As of that point, when Claimant knew or should
have known of his receipt of double payments, Claimant's activities constituted deliberate action. S
holiday pay claim for February 20, 1984, aside from that of an innocent
mistake.
Under the circumstances of this case, we also find that the penalty
of discharge was excessive. Therefore, we shall award that Claimant be returned to service with seni
lost.
In light of the above, it is unnecessary to address the issue raised
by the parties concerning the effect of Claimant's refusal to accept the Carrier's leniency offer.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the discipline was excessive.
A W A R D
Claim sustained in accordance with the Opinion.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:<~e.~yy
Nancy J. ever - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 13th day of July 1987.