NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-26169
Eckehard Muessig, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerk,
(Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Chicago and North Western Transportation Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
(GL-9951) that:
1. Carrier violated the terms and provisions of the current Clerks'
Agreement, particularly Rule 21, when on March 8, 1983, the Carrier issued
Discipline Notice No. 13 to D. J. Stafiej, assessing him a 30-day suspension
effective with the termination of his assignment commencing at 3:59 P.M. March
9, 1983, after investigation which was held on March 2, 1983.
2. Carrier shall now be required to compensate Mr. D.J. Stafiej for
all time lost as a result of the 30-day suspension and that his record be
cleared of such entry."
OPINION OF BOARD: Subsequent to an Investigation, the Claimant was found
guilty of the charge that he has failed to properly protect
his assignment on February 10, 1983, because he reported late for duty that
day. Although it is clear that the Claimant did not present himself on rime
to begin work, the evidence is controverted with respect to how many minutes
he was late.
Accordingly, the general issue here is whether, in view of the facts
and circumstances of record and the principles applied by this Division in
discipline cases, some lesser penalty would be sufficient discipline for the
offense committed.
It is well established that the Claimant bears a responsibility to
allow sufficient time to travel to work and to be at his work place by the
start of his designated shift. In this case, the Claimant reported late
because his car broke down close to the Carrier's parking lot. The evidence
indicates that his tardiness was caused because he stayed with his car until
it was moved from the roadway. The record is devoid of a copy of the Carrier's Discipline Notice I/1
proper evidence before us to show whether the Carrier used any past proven
tardiness by the Claimant to determine the measure of the discipline it
finally assessed.
Therefore, on the record properly before us and under all the circumstances shown, while tardine
find a letter of reprimand more commensurate with the single proven offense
which, at most, consisted of a few minutes tardiness.
Award Number 26451 Page 2
Docket Number CL-26169
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the discipline was excessive.
A W A R D
Claim sustained in accordance with the Opinion.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attes~Z~~
Nancy er - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois this 24th day of August 1987.