NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number MS-27189
(Charles P. Holgate
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Burlington Northern Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "The individual states his claim as follows:
Did Burlington Northern Railroad have the right to withhold employment
and back-pay, as agreed to by B.R.A.C. representative and Terminal Superintendent, because of a Rele
Northern agent, James L. Steele, through deliberately false and fradulent
statements that I would not be reinstated, and unless the release was signed,
I would have all injury benefits withheld. Because of this, I did sign said
release and my employment was terminated.
In truth and fact, Burlington Northern Railroad was unaware of the
release and resignation and surrender of my employment rights and agreed to
reinstate me with seniority umimpaired without pay for time lost. However,
when it was learned that I had already relinquished my seniority rights, the
reinstatement offer was cancelled.
Because of the above, I have suffered finanical loss, loss of pension
benefits, loss of career position, and the other security offered by employment with Burlington Nort
OPINION OF BOARD: The record shows that the Claimant (Petitioner) was dis
missed from service by the Carrier, effective May 22, 1984,
following a formal Investigation in connection with his allegedly attempted
forced entry into a locked office of the Carrier on May 12, 1984.
Following Claimant's dismissal, Claim was initiated by the Local
Chairman of the Collective Bargaining Unit representing the craft in which
Claimant had been employed, that Claimant be reinstated to the service of the
Carrier with all rights and seniority unimpaired, and that he be reimbursed
for all wages lost from May 22, 1984. On July 2, 1984, Agreement was entered
into by Carrier's Superintendent and the Local Chairman of the Organization,
providing for the reinstatement of Claimant as a matter of managerial leniency
but without pay for wages lost as a result of his dismissal.
The record also shows that on June 28, 1984, in settlement of a Claim
involving an alleged personal injury, Claimant signed a document titled "RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS" cont
...for the sole consideration of $30,000.00... I
release and forever discharge Burlington Northern
Railroad Company... from all claims and liabilities
Award Number 26470 Page 2
Docket Number MS-27189
of every kind and nature... I...further understand
and agree... that this voluntary resignation constitutes a complete surrender of all my rights, incl
any labor union..."
At the bottom of the form, Claimant wrote in his own handwriting:
"I have read and fully understand the above release
and agree I am giving up my right to return to work."
On July 12, 1984, Carrier's Superintendent wrote to the Local Chairman of the Organization:
"Refer to your conversation this date with Tom Lee
of my staff concerning the reinstatement of former
crew hauler C. P. Holgate.
Inasmuch as Mr. Holgate relinquished his seniority
rights with the Claims Department on June 28, 1984,
the previously agreeded (sic) upon reinstatement is
hereby cancelled."
Claimant then attempted further handling of Claim for reinstatement
with pay for time lost, which Claim was rejected by the Carrier. Claimant and
his attorney initiated a law suit against the Carrier in the United States
District Court, Western District of Washington, which suit was dismissed by
the Court.
The issue before the Board is whether the terms of "RELEASE OF ALL
CLAIMS" signed by Claimant on June 28, 1986, released the Carrier from further
employment by Claimant. We find and hold that the language of the release
signed by Claimant did release the Carrier from further employment of Claimant. We must give the lan
The Claim before the Board is moot and must be dismissed. (See
Third Division Award Nos. 20832, 22645, 24869, 25678.)
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934;
Award Number 26470 Page 3
Docket Number MS-27189
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Claim be dismissed.
A W A R D
Claim dismissed.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:
ancy J. er - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois this 9th day of September 1987.