NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number MW-26133
Irwin M. Lieberman, Referee
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Consolidated Rail Corporation
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The Carrier violated the Agreement when it removed Claimant J.
P. Daugherty from his regularly assigned Track Patrol Foreman's position on
June 22, 1983 and subsequently disqualified him as a Track Patrol Foreman
effective July 25, 1983 to August 23, 1983 (System Docket CR-229-D/MW-3-26).
(2) The claimant's record shall be cleared and he shall be compensated for all wage loss suffere
$3873.26."
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant was a Track Patrol Foreman at the time of the
incident involved in this dispute. He was charged with
failing to properly inspect the track at Mile Post 47.5 resulting in a
derailment on June 18, 1983. Following a Hearing Claimant was found guilty
and disqualified as a Track Patrol Foreman. Subsequently, after an appeal,
the discipline was reduced to disqualification for the period of July 25,
1983, to August 23, 1983. It is that discipline which is the subject of this
dispute. The Organization alleges that the charges were not precise and that
Carrier failed to prove Claimant's guilt. Carrier, on the other hand, con
tends that Claimant was clearly guilty of the infractions charged and that the
discipline was appropriate.
The Board does not agree with the Organization with respect to the
charges. It is apparent that Claimant was able to mount a defense without
difficulty and the charges were sufficient to apprise him of the nature of the
problem. With respect to the merits, an evaluation of the Transcript of the
Investigation reveals ample credible testimony to support Carrier's conclusion
with regard to Claimant's culpability. The measure of revised discipline
imposed by Carrier cannot be considered to have been harsh, discriminatory or
an abuse of discretion. It may not be disturbed.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act
as approved June 21, 1934;
Award Number 26490 Page 2
Docket Number MW-26133
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:
ancy J er - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 9th day of September 1987.