NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number MW-26764
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
1. The fourteen (14) days of suspension and the thirty (30) days
deferred suspension imposed upon Machine Operator G. M. Marcum for alleged
violation of Rules '91', '98' and '100' was without just and sufficient cause
(System File 600-12).
2. The claimant's record shall be cleared of the charges leveled
against him and he shall be compensated for all wage loss suffered."
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant, a Machine Operator holding a seniority date of
February, 1974, was assessed suspensions of 14 days
(actual) and 30 days (deferred) after Hearing and by letter dated August 29,
1984, for failing to properly perform repairs on certain track sections. The ,
disciplinary action involved in this case arises out of the same incidents
occurring on or about August 2, 1984, discussed in Third Division Award 26530.
The record demonstrates that Claimant was assigned to certain duties
including the operation of torsion beam tamper that if performed correctly
would not have resulted in the track section being in substandard condition
with unspiked ties and unsupported rail after the repairs were made. Substantial evidence can theref
However, although we believe discipline was appropriate due to
Claimant's responsibility for the disrepair of the track section, we are of
the opinion that the amount of discipline imposed was harsh. We shall therefore reduce the actual su
that Claimant be compensated accordingly.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act
as approved June 21, 1934;
Award Number 26529 Page 2
Docket Number MW-26764
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Discipline was excessive.
A W A R D
Claim sustained in accordance with the Opinion.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
011
Attest:
Nancy J. 006er - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 30th day of September 1987.