NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number MW-15861
Robert W. MCALIisteC, Referee
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of ,.'ay Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company (Southern Region)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
1. The Agreement was violated when, beginning January 24, 1983,
other than Roadway Machine Operator Group employes were used to operate a tie
handler on the E&BV Subdivision (System File C-TC-1790/MG-4018).
2. (a) Because of the aforesaid violation, Machine Operator R. D.
Day shall be allowed eight (8) hours of pay at the tie handlers's straight
time rate for each work day he was furloughed and the difference between what
he should have been paid at the tie handler's rate and what he was paid at the
trackman's rate, subsequent to recall, beginning sixty (60) days retroactive
from April 6, 1983.
(b) The position of tie handler operator on the E&BV Subdivision shall be bulletined and awa
OPINION OF
BOARD: This
dispute involves the Carrier's assigning a Carpenter
from the Bridge and Structure Group without machine opera
tor seniority to operate a Tie Handler machine during the period, January 24,
1983, to April 6, 1983. The Organization contends this assignment is improper
and the work has customarily, historically, and traditionally been performed
by the Carrier's Roadway Machine Operator Forces. Furthermore, the Organiza
tion argues the work is contractually reserved to them by Rule 66(f) which
states:
"Employees in the roadway machine operator group
will be used to operate all of the so-called
heavier machines used in the performance of track
and bridges and structures work except Mole Ballast
Cleaners (see Paragraph (b) above). The smaller
machine tools, such as power saws, tampers, drills,
etc. will be used by the craft or class doing the
particular work the same as the craft or class uses
hand tools in connection with such work."
The Carrier asserts the safety factors involved in a nine span dock
plate girder bridge one hundred fifty-two (152) feet above the ground necessitated the use of a qual
ignores the specific rights of employees in the Roadway Machine Operator Group
to operate "so-called heavier machines." As the Board noted in Third Division
Award 25926, the dispute is similar to that involved in prior Third Division
Awards 25924 and 25925. We consider this case to be on point with Third
Division Award 25926, which in pertinent part states:
Award Number 26554 Page 2
pocket Number MW-25861
"As discussed in the two previously cited Awards,
the Board finds convincing basis for the Organization's position as to the clear and precise effect
of Rule ob (f). Seniority rights are not limited
to instances where an employee must take an initiative, especially where he may have no advance
knowledge of the assignment of other employees.-'
The Organization seeks payment of eight (8) hours for each day the
Claimant was furloughed and the Tie Handler was operated during the period
January 24 through April 2, 1983. :notwithstanding, there is nothing in the
record to rebut Carrier's contention the Tie Handler was operated by the
Carpenter for eighteen (18) days. Therefore, we will sustain the Claim to the
extent that the Claimant is entitled to the appropriate rate of pay for eighteen (18) days less his
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was violated.
A W A R D
Claim sustained in accordance with the Opinion.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest.
Nancy J. Dever - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 30th day of September 1987.