NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number MW-26987
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and
( Pacific Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
that:
(1) The dismissal of Laborer J. C. Jefferson for allegedly 'falsifying your 171 injury report of
company doctor on August 30, 1984 as instructed' was without just and sufficient cause and on the ba
(2) The claimant shall be reinstated with seniority and all other
rights unimpaired and he shall be compensated for all wage loss suffered."
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant was terminated by the Carrier by letter dated
August 31, 1984, which informed him:
"Your services . . . are hereby terminated for (falsefying) (sic) your 171 injury report of Augu
and failing to report to the Company doctor on August 30,
1984."
At a Hearing conducted on September 18, 1984, Claimant testified
that on Friday, August 3, 1984, at about 1:00 P.M. he grabbed a rail that was
swinging from a Pettibone Crane to keep it from striking him and as he did so
he felt something pulling in his back. As he had previously received permission to leave at 2:00 P.M
Monday" he went home without saying anything to anyone. When he got home the
pain increased so he went to a medical building at which he believed a company
doctor had offices. Not finding the doctor, Claimant went home.
On August 6, 1984, Roadmaster Bock was told by Foreman Silva that
Claimant's wife called to say Claimant had a back problem. Bock called Claimant's home. Claimant was
he injured his back on the job and told him if so a Form 171 had to be completed. According to Bock,
and repeated this twice or three times, saying "the thing had been coming on
slowly."
Claimant's version of this conversation is that when Bock asked if he
was hurt on the job he replied:
Award Number 26590 Page 2
Docket Number MW-26987
"I said I would rather not get into it now. I said
because I want to see a doctor and see what the injury is all about because I have been having probl
with my glands here and I thought maybe that could be
the problem, although when I picked up that rail it
hurt, ya see, so that is what I told Mr. Bock."
About noon. on August 6, 1984, Claimant filled out the 171 Form.
According to Bock various attempts to reach Claimant failed so he
ordered Clerk Hugo to instruct Claimant to see Dr. Baker when Claimant came in
on August 30, 1984, for his check. Claimant went to see the doctor on August
31, 1984, but by then the letter of dismissal had been sent. He denied he was
told to go on any specific date. He also testified he told the Clerk on
August 30, 1984, that he could not go to the doctor that morning because a
Claim Adjuster was coming to his home.
On September 25, 1984, the Carrier notified Claimant his discharge
was upheld.
The Organization argues Claimant was in fact injured and did not falsify the Form 171. It furthe
This Board has often noted it is in no position to resolve credibility or factual questions. Whe
knows. However, Bock's testimony that Claimant repeatedly denied being
injured at work, coupled with Claimant's statement that he refused to discuss
the matter with Bock when questioned, afforded Carrier a reasonable -sis upon
which to conclude the Form 171 was not factual. Claimant's contention that he
told Hugo why he could not see the doctor on August 30, 1984, may be considered inconsistent with hi
circumstances of this case this Board cannot conclude the charges were not
proven.
The Organization also contends Claimant was not afforded due process
in that the Division Engineer, who rendered the decision, was not the Hearing
Officer. That position was not taken on the property and therefore we cannot
now consider it.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934;
Award Number 26590 Page 3
Docket Number MW-26987
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
AttestL-
~Ll~ °'.
Nancy J.,De/Er - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois this 27th day of October 1987.